Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EXPERTS: Damage to NSA Reputation May Be Irreversible

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 06:57 AM
Original message
EXPERTS: Damage to NSA Reputation May Be Irreversible
Some fear eavesdropping could undermine work of spy agency

BY WARREN P. STROBEL AND JONATHAN S. LANDAY
Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - The White House decision to order surveillance of international phone calls by U.S. citizens without a warrant violated longstanding practices and could undermine a key U.S. intelligence agency that's critical in the struggle against terrorists, former senior intelligence officials and other experts said this week.

The super-secret National Security Agency, which eavesdropped on the Soviet Union's leaders and scored other intelligence coups during the Cold War, has spent three decades recovering from domestic spying scandals in the 1970s.

Now, with its electronic ears and vast computer banks turned primarily to intercepting suspecting terrorists, the officials said they fear that the NSA once again will bear the brunt of congressional scrutiny and public outrage, complicating its mission.

"The damage it's done to NSA's reputation is almost irreversible in my view," said a longtime top intelligence official with intimate knowledge of the agency's workings.

http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/politics/13476242.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. What happened was not its fault. Some of their people resigned...
rather than execute the administration's policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. too bad they didn't have much faith in the whistleblowers act.....
they should have come forward, but fear does its work in many many varying ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. Its not nearly that simple
When you work for such an organization as the NSA in any remotely sensitive position, you must have a military security clearance. When you get said clearance it becomes illegal for you to even talk about what goes on in your job.

How do I know? I was there- I worked on an Echelon base during my Air Force tour in the mid-70s. I had a top secret codeword clearance, and I'm certain that if I discussed any classified aspect of my work even today, I could be arrested.

There is no "whistleblowing" when you have a classified military clearance, unless you're willing to do time behind bars in Ft. Leavenworth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. If you renounced your citizenship, (not uncommon) moved to
Canada.... and let her rip.... could they still come and getcha??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Tear
"The damage it's done to NSA's reputation is almost irreversible in my view,"

What reputation was that exactly? That of a giant, secret spy agency? Did they help out poor children in the hospital?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Those who violate their oath, even by their silence
are complicit as co-conspirators. Time to make some heads roll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. A security net is usless against outside terrorists if the focus is
on guys like John Kerry, Howard Dean and Joe LIEberman, who ran against Bush last year. America's security has been diluted into a state of uselessness, by intercepting and sorting domestic information and spending the man hours on politics, or on checking out the American people's reading habits. The neocons are not worried much about foreign terrorists, or they would concentrate all the security effort America can afford, on fighting terrorists over there, instead of playing politics and snooping over here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. If they were serious
they'd be diligently upgrading port security, steadfastly securing the borders, and inspecting a good deal of airline baggage. Starting several years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. Bush would have gotten body slammed out of office by Kerry,...
just like Clinton had body slammed w's ole natural Daddy before him. If shrub hadn't used every tool at his disposal, including his gubmint spy ring, to assure a political victory last year, even Diebold couldn't have pulled it out, IMO. I'll bet the neocons spied on Arlan Specter too, because the GOPers were upset with Specter, for wanting to play by the rules of law on the patriot act. I've noticed that Arlan Sphincter has gone with the neocon flow more often lately, since he's won his senate seat back last year. Maybe the spooks have spooked him and he found out about it.

Bush is the uber Troll from Hell, that was hiding underneath Clinton's "Bridge to the 21st Century!" The Pubby's Pandoric Democracy Killing Pandemic and the Plague of the New Millennia! America is very sick now that the fungi in chief owns the government, instead of the people. OUR VOTES ARE TRASH thanks to the GOP...Our Liberty and Freedom are trash now, thanks to the PNAC. PEACE ON EARTH...is dead now, thanks to the neocons.

Merry F---ing Christmas!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. This is their way of attacking those who reported the story
For months now, Rush Limbaugh has been talking about how unnecessary the Plame investigation is, how its just a partisan witch-hunt.

But now he has been calling, almost daily, for investigations of who "leaked" the news of spying on Americans.

These people just don't get it.

When you expose secrets to bring illegal activity to light, you're a whistle-blower.

When you break the law to settle a political score, you're an asshole.


Subtle difference.


Its sorta like that backlash after the whole "torture-room" mess a while back.

"Liberals are exposing government secrets because they want the US to lose! They are undermining American security!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arianrhod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. "These people just don't get it." Yes, they do.
The anti-constitutionalists who have hijacked our country know precisely what they are doing. They have been working to this end for 50 years now, starting with Duane Gish's "Creationist" movement, through Hoover, Daley, Watergate, the Ford pardons, Iran-Contra, the "Moral Majority", the "Christian Coalition", the "Contract With America", the false Persian Gulf War, the set-up in Somalia, PNAC, the impeachment of Clinton, and the appointment of Bush--who is surrounded by ALL the same men who were working this agenda under Reagan, and who created Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein (and set the stage for Ayatollah Khomeini).

They understand things very well indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. Good! This is supposed to be a transparant gov't run by the people.
Not a "super-secret" cabal run by the bosses and protected by "super-secret" flunkies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. i'm sorry but that i don't see, the NSA is an entity prone...
to following presidential orders, their aparatus is a tremendous assest, it will be the willful reputation of the president who orders it otherwise that will suffer the longer term disrepair imo

too many 'experts' thought it was a good idea to go into iraq at the time for that matter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. Come back to us, Frank Church..
Your country needs you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
11. WHAT "Reputation"?
No damage....I STILL consider them Murka's version of the GESTAPO...

They do shit for the White House that even the CIA has reservations about doing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
13. Poor NSA
Their reputation is hurt. Now they might actually have to answer questions at the next budget appropriation hearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
14. The Person Who Wrote This Clearly Understands Nothing About the NSA
It just doesn't work the way all these uninformed people think it does.

There is absolutely nothing - and that really needs to be repeated - NOTHING in common about how the CIA works and how the NSA works. To say they are similar is about like an utterly uninformed person saying saying that the Executive Branch and he Congress must both have the same rules and procedures for day to day operations because they are both part of he Government. Anyone who knows anything at all about how they work would never make a comparison.

As to the notion that it could undermine their activities, that is simply laughable. People have no idea what their activities are, how they are accomplished, or how far - or not so far - reaching they are. How have they been damaged, by people knowing Fort Mead exists? Laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. they had a reputation to begin with?
actually, they DO have a reputation in my book, but current events are IMPROVING my version.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Secrecy and lack of accountability
make reputation a joke. It is legitimate to suspect the worst if the truth is hidden if only to pressure
for enough oversight to reveal that those suspicions are utterly unfounded. or else in a scandalous debacle one finds out it is worse or not as bad as the evidence deprived theorists suspected and treacherously exposes by its own fault its daily operations and limits or wasteful, threatening lack thereof.

The sour medicine of accountability and oversight and REGULATION(you know, law, rational control, disciplined viability) is something any organization prone to oppose such must be forced to take for its own good.

Now they have the same odor of respectability as Enron, the GOP or FOX News just for obeying orders from above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. That hurts.
Their charter and their whole culture forbid acting against US citizens.

Spying is an act of war. To spy on American citizens is to wage war against America. The agents I knew were too patriotic to commit acts of treachery against their own people.

I have a friend that is still inside. I wonder what is happening with him and how he feels about bush soiling the agency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC