|
Deep question, and one that will have me thinking for days.
For now, though, I offer my shortsighted (or is it short-term/practical) thoughts:
1. Create a fully funded Broadcasting Network capable of fully competing with the best FOX, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, in most aspects and blows them away in terms of investigative news in support of (a) educating the public, (b) communicating the facts or "the truth", and (c) providing perceptive analysis of the issues, news, events, policies, government, society, foreign policy, etc. Just providing the service of actually seeking out the facts about what's going on, who's doing it and why in an honest, factual way with real "fair and balanced coverage" would be sufficient--but, I would also like it to provide a proper "Liberal" interpretation and viewpoint.
2. Immediately restore Taxes on all Americans to the F.Y. 2000 level with greater increases on Corporations (especially those who export jobs). Perhaps with additional temporary increases for several years to make up for the revenues lost, with interest, as a result of the Bush Tax-Cuts. Plus even more increases to reflect those that would naturally have occurred over the Bush terms as a result of inflation and special needs (such as increased foreign aid (tsunami, africa, pakistan's earthquake), domestic catastrophes (Katrina/New Orleans, other hurricanes, etc), preparation for avian flu/vaccine production facilities, and war costs for IRAQ/Afghanistan (unfortunately)). It should be made to reflect whatever would have been likely under a Democratic Congress/Presidency as much as possible.
These are the two things I would do asap to attempt to save the country's future. Creation of a valid "fourth estate", an honest broadcast (and print) News/media would serve to help American citizens to make the right choices including rejecting the current self-destructive Republican policies (and lead to restored balance in elected office-Congress/Presidency and even subsequently the Supreme Court). Tax Restoration would serve to help prevent the inevitable economic damage or collapse associated with enormous debt while preventing the harm caused by attempting to handle the problem by cutting spending--thus maintaining appropriate social assistance programs.
If I could, I would tack on the implementation of a National Healthcare System--if nothing else, a model of Canada's would do. This is a problem whose time has come as it's causing enormous economic competitive disadvantage (and Corporations agree) in addition to the human costs of the current system. Alas, the limit was two.
Now then, if I were to consider larger potential changes... Or perhaps changes that don't seem even remotely do-able (or that would require almost magical changes), the list might be utterly different. Of course, there are also other potential and potentially possible changes that might be of serious value... Consider creating term limits for Congress--so that none there can become so powerful (remember power corrupts), meaning each state is fairly and equally represented (not gaining an advantage from having a "senior" member), as well as offering more Americans the chance to serve their country. Perhaps that's flawed in that Congressmen wouldn't necessarily have the time needed to become highly skilled--but then again, don't we just want them to go there and honestly represent our best interests--without expecting our representative to develop exceptional "power" or "influence" over others... any intelligent, well-spoken person can do the job of Congressman/Senator (it's not even close to brain surgery/rocket science). Also, relatedly, our Congresspeople spend MOST of their time in Washington seeking to obtain funding for their next election campaign--including catering therefore to special interests and Corporations! Therefore, some form of "real" Campaign Finance Reform is urgently needed--but it's a problem that's inordinately hard to fix and we almost cannot hope Congress will fix themselves... Additionally, as it is, it takes millions of dollars to run for Congress--most Americans, no matter how qualified, intelligent, honest, hard-working, etc. they are cannot hope to ever participate in Congress (or the Presidency). It's true, we seem to have a natural bias--that our leaders "should be" "Successful", ie. "Rich" (which may not be so wise after all). However, if the Finance Reform also managed to change the way campaigns are not only financed, but how they're run to ensure that they don't either "cost" or "waste" millions of dollars--in so doing, we would have changedthe make-up of Congress (for the better!) by allowing many, many more "real" Americans (who are more likely to understand AND care about what affects most of us) to both run for and participate in Congress! This would be a worthy change.
Well, that's enough for one go round.
|