Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Tried to Kill Post CIA Prison Story

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 08:21 AM
Original message
Bush Tried to Kill Post CIA Prison Story
Bush Tried to Kill Post CIA Prison Story
by SusanG
Sun Dec 25, 2005 at 09:52:07 PM PDT
Last week, we learned that Bush summoned New York Times editors to the Oval Office in an effort to kill the NSA domestic surveillance story.

Now we can add another summons to the list ... according to tomorrow's WaPo, Bush put pressure on the Post as well to kill its CIA secret prison story.

Neither newspaper complied.
http://www.dailykos.com/


Bush Presses Editors on Security

By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, December 26, 2005; C01



President Bush has been summoning newspaper editors lately in an effort to prevent publication of stories he considers damaging to national security.

The efforts have failed, but the rare White House sessions with the executive editors of The Washington Post and New York Times are an indication of how seriously the president takes the recent reporting that has raised questions about the administration's anti-terror tactics.

Leonard Downie Jr., The Post's executive editor, would not confirm the meeting with Bush before publishing reporter Dana Priest's Nov. 2 article disclosing the existence of secret CIA prisons in Eastern Europe used to interrogate terror suspects. Bill Keller, executive editor of the Times, would not confirm that he, publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. and Washington bureau chief Philip Taubman had an Oval Office sit-down with the president on Dec. 5, 11 days before reporters James Risen and Eric Lichtblau revealed that Bush had authorized eavesdropping on Americans and others within the United States without court orders.

But the meetings were confirmed by sources who have been briefed on them but are not authorized to comment because both sides had agreed to keep the sessions off the record. The White House had no comment.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/25/AR2005122500665_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. What a busy little boy he's been!
He was and still is on Santa's naughty list.

Impeach!Impeach!Impeach!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Will the Iraqis, once they shake us off, and shrub is no longer in
the wh, ask for extradition so they can try him for warcrimes?? One would think since they are trying Saddam for exactly the same behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. "damaging to national security" = Cover Bush's Ass!
Bush is sending a message to America..."F??K OFF, I'M THE KING!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. More evidence of WH un-constitutional activity
Prior restraints on speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. What does he care, he doesn't read
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. The same confidentiality
agreement we had with released detainees who were tortured? Hmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Interesting tidbit from same article:

The admission by two columnists that they accepted payments from indicted Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff may be the tip of a large and rather dirty iceberg.

Copley News Service last week dropped Doug Bandow -- who also resigned as a Cato Institute scholar -- after he acknowledged taking as much as $2,000 a pop from Abramoff for up to two dozen columns favorable to the lobbyist's clients. "I am fully responsible and I won't play victim," Bandow said in a statement after Business Week broke the story. "Obviously, I regret stupidly calling to question my record of activism and writing that extends over 20 years. . . . For that I deeply apologize."


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/25/AR2005122500665_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-26-05 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. Can you imagine how many stories haven't been printed?
Edited on Mon Dec-26-05 09:32 AM by zanne
With this administration, all you see is the tip of the iceberg. In the years ahead, I think loads of information will come out about the Bush administration. If editors want to cozy up to Bush, all they have to do is claim national security issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC