Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What were the Dems reactions to snoopgate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 10:52 AM
Original message
What were the Dems reactions to snoopgate?
I believe I know Conyers was his usually sterling, I seem to remember Byrd taking out his little constitution.
Can we pool our info on everyone? Seems like an important issue to matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Feingold had a strong reaction...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Feingold, Byrd, Conyers - good guys. Who else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Who was the rep who first called for possible impeachment? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Robert Wexler? Not sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I thought it was somebody Brown?
not Encyclopedia Brown
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I know there's a resolution for an investigation in the senate 2 Dems,2Rs
There are some voices in the House as well. Considering they won't reconvene till the end of January, it would be good to list them here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Rep. John Lewis-see#6. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. Rep. John Lewis, here:
http://www.house.gov/johnlewis/05pressreleases/pr121905.html

Rep. John Lewis Says No Justification for NSA Spying on American Citizens

December 19, 2005 - During the White House press briefing today, President Bush tried to justify his domestic spying program, recently revealed in reports by The New York Times, which indicated the President signed an order in 2002 allowing wiretapping and eavesdropping on American citizens without court approval as required by law. Rep. Lewis responded to these reports and the President’s recent comments on his domestic spying program:

“The President has offered no substantive justification for the National Security Agency’s domestic spying program on American citizens. Neither has he provided the legal foundation for this controversial program, the specific statutes and constitutional authority alluded to by his former National Security advisor, Condoleeza Rice.

“In my opinion, the President has violated the law, and the House and Senate must pursue their inquiries into this illegal program. The President must stop using the threat of terrorism and the tactics of fear to invade the privacy of American citizens. George W. Bush is the president. He is not a king. He is not above the law.

“This executive order takes us back to the dark past when our government spied on Civil Rights leaders and Vietnam War protestors. Without obtaining the judicial authorization required to wiretap American citizens, the American people have no protection against the misuse of this program for illegal or vindictive means. The very system of democracy the President seeks to protect is undermined by this controversial program. Principles fundamental to our Constitution and values central to the American way of life have been violated in this situation--the separation of powers, the right to privacy of American citizens, as well as the freedom of the press. In this country we have a press that operates independently from the government and its duty is to act as a check on government activity. The President should not chastise the press for exercising its Constitutional authority.

“President Bush and Vice President Cheney have said that the White House informed the leadership of Congress and ranking members of the intelligence committee about this questionable program. However, it seems clear that there was no respect for the objections of those elected representatives who raised concerns about this domestic spying program. I look forward to further inquiry in the House and Senate on these matters. The American people deserve the truth. We must gather the facts and determine once and for all whether the law was violated. There is no question that the U.S. Congress has impeached presidents for lesser offenses.”


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kerry: "unconstitutional"
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&pubid=968163964505&cid=1135119017239&col=968705899037&call_page=TS_News&call_pageid=968332188492&call_pagepath=News/News

Kerry says White House spying unconstitutional
'There is no wording whatsoever in the law that permits what he engaged in,' ex-presidential candidate charges
Dec. 20, 2005. 06:10 PM
ASSOCIATED PRESS


BOSTON — Domestic spying authorized by the White House ``doesn't uphold our Constitution" and President Bush's defense of the practice is "lame," Sen. John Kerry said Tuesday.

The Massachusetts Democrat also said the alleged White House leak of a CIA agent's identity was more serious than the media's disclosure of the spying program.

Bush said Monday it was "a shameful act" for someone to have leaked details of the spying program that he authorized shortly after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

The program allows the National Security Agency to eavesdrop — without warrants — on international calls and e-mails of Americans and others inside the U.S. with suspected ties to Al Qaeda.

Kerry, talking with reporters after addressing ironworkers at a local labor hall, contrasted the media's disclosure of the spy program with the White House leak involving Valerie Plame.

(snip)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Also on Ed Schultz - Bush not on legal ground
"He (Bush) is not on legal ground." (12/21/05, Kerry speaking on the Ed Schultz show)

http://audio.wegoted.com/podcasting/122105SenatorKerry.mp3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Kerry: Bush stepping on rights of American citizens
http://www.bangornews.com/news/templates/?a=125406

Kerry stumps for Baldacci re-election bid
Monday, December 19, 2005 - Bangor Daily News
:
:
:
During his 15-minute speech at the Sea Dog, Kerry touched on such hot-button issues as Iraq and recent reports of the National Security Administration spying on Americans without obtaining court warrants.

"I guess I ought to speak softly, just in case President Bush is listening," Kerry said to the appreciative audience, some of whom responded, "No, louder, louder."

Kerry had more to say about the spying revelations when questioned later at a gathering inside the Baldacci family business, Momma Baldacci's Italian Restaurant.

Calling the NSA news "very, very disturbing," the Massachusetts senator said that with the exception of the most urgent national security circumstances, such as direct information about attacks, there is no reason such wire tapping couldn't go through a legitimate legal review process.

"This administration is out of control, and they're stepping on the rights of American citizens," Kerry said.
:
:
:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC