bwwwwaaaaa Dems question HS....... LOL

lonestarnot

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Dec-28-05 12:03 PM
Original message

bwwwwaaaaa Dems question HS....... LOL

:rofl:

http://www.yahoo.com/s/266419

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Crazy Dave

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Dec-28-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message

1. I hear they have real nice office furniture.

No expenses were spared when it came to $4000 solid oak desks and $2000 wall decorations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

lonestarnot

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Dec-28-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #1

2. Trimmed in ornate dogshit?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

annabanana

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Dec-28-05 12:25 PM
Response to Original message

3. This whole Department was cobbled together

by a reluctant administration.. Its mandate is mushy, its organizational structure is odd, its funding is intermittant..

Why should anyone be surprised that it's ended up like a horse assembled by a committee?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

lonestarnot

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Dec-28-05 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #3

4. I smell its mold. HS mold! Horse Shit on HS! what a crock and

an embarrassing laughing stock coming from the richest country in the world. Ask Katrina victims about the mold.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

SoCalDem

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Dec-28-05 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #3

5. It was a payback to Ridge

He was 'supposed' to be veep, but Darth Cheney nixed that..

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

bigtree

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Dec-28-05 12:47 PM
Response to Original message

6. what about security? We may not need the HS Dept. but we're stuck with it

Edited on Wed Dec-28-05 12:47 PM by bigtree

for the short term, maybe longer. Democrats are trying to exercise their oversight responsibilities. These Democrats that were reported on are not tasked with unwraveling the entire cabal that has hijacked our security organizations for Bush's neocon agenda. That is being pursued by others. These Democrats are asking reasonable questions related to our national security.

Are we at risk of terrorist attacks? If so, what to do?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

lonestarnot

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Dec-28-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #6

7. Understand, but nothing but nothing will make us safer with Chimpshitler

Edited on Wed Dec-28-05 01:11 PM by lonestarnot

freak in office. He's not in favor of any protection that would take advantage of his explotation of the fear factor. 9/11 was his toy. So bushitler and safety are a contradiction in terms. Can't use them in the same sentence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Mon May 13th 2024, 03:05 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.