|
combines with oxygen (from the air) to form water and produce energy, so as a fuel it is clean. However it also requires (or at least works best and cleanest using) fuel cells, for which low cost technology is a long way off. (The demo cars cost 7 figures.)
Moreover hydrogen is not easily obtainable, requiring power and a source to produce. The sources talked about are oil, gas, and coal. So basically we shift the pollution to the producing areas.
Hydrogen has long term potential but it works best using fusion (potentially clean and basically limitless power) and water cracking technologies to produce it (which makes a circular process --- energy/water in -- energy/water out). However if the powers that be point this out, people might think about the disgraceful lack of work on fusion technology.
Hydrogen has other problems like explosion risk and the problem of storing enough to get good range. In short it is scam at least for the near term. It is also away of turning people's attention away from electric cars for which the technology has greatly improved to the point of practicality and for which some infrastructure is already in place and more easily added. Combine electric cars with improved (home) solar and the oil, gas and coal companies (who would control hydrogen) are in real trouble. So we can forget about this route.
|