Contraction question
LostInAnomie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu May-06-04 08:47 PM
Original message
Why is the word "won't" the contraction for "will not"? Shouldn't it be "willn't"?
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu May-06-04 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
now I'll be awake all night....
madmax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu May-06-04 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thought this was a childbirth question.
Endangered Specie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu May-06-04 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I highly doubt anyone having those would be capable of posting on DU...
opiate69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu May-06-04 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. because it's actually the contraction of
LostInAnomie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu May-06-04 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What is "wouldn't" the contraction of then?
opiate69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu May-06-04 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
"wouldn't" isn't actually grammatically correct. Just a colloquialism which worked it's way into the mainstream, kind of like "ain't".
LostInAnomie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu May-06-04 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Then what is the correct contraction for "will not"?
BlueJazz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu May-06-04 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
LostInAnomie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu May-06-04 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. "I wilt eat green eggs and ham."
It just doesn't sound right.
opiate69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu May-06-04 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. OK.. looks like I was wrong..
just did a little research, and it seems that "would" is the past tense of "will". Apparently that's where the "o" comes from... he... who knew?
suigeneris
(471 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu May-06-04 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. Google. Knows everything. I've gotta buy some.
http://www.quinion.com/words/qa/qa-won1.htm From Donald Eckhardt; similar questions came from Joe Pallas, David Beckham, Margaret Diamond, Lyle Wiedeman, and John Elliot: “You discussed the missing apostrophe in shan’t recently, but not the related contraction for will not—won’t—which not only has a missing apostrophe, but the substitute letter o. How so?” OK, everyone, I know when I’m outnumbered! Apologies for having taken so long to produce the answer to this one. Actually willn’t is not unknown historically as a contracted form of will not, though it has never been common; Charlotte Brontë used it in Shirley in 1849 in order to represent local Yorkshire speech: “That willn’t wash, Miss”. It turns up also in Mary Barton by Elizabeth Gaskell: “No, indeed I willn’t tell, come what may”. So why the o in the contraction when it should be i? The answer lies in the irregularity of the verb will: it varied a great deal in different places and at different times. Though the present tense was often wil or wille, there was a period when it appeared as wol or wolle; this was especially common in the Midlands of England in the late medieval period, and may have been an unconscious imitation of the simple past tense, which was spelled and said with an o as standard. For some reason, though the present tense eventually standardised on will, the contraction of the negative settled down to be won’t, using the vowel from the other form.
i_no_knothing
(20 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu May-06-04 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
I think it is an anomolly.......11(eleven) should be "one-t_one"
i_no_knothing
(20 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu May-06-04 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. too bad that esperanta language never took off
Edited on Thu May-06-04 11:22 PM by i_no_knothing
i_no_knothing
(20 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Thu May-06-04 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. willn't could be a word that poets would understand
try it out on a poetry sight
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)
Thu May 09th 2024, 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.