Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How do exceptions prove the rule?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 12:18 AM
Original message
How do exceptions prove the rule?
Somone was talking about music sucking and saying if the lead singer was replaced, then the music sucks. They referenced Van Halen, "not Van Hagar." Then someone else talked about AC/DC replacing a singer before Back in Black and someone said that is the exception that proves the rule. I just don't quite get the meaning of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. It doesn't
It's a stupid saying. An exception breaks the rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AwakeAtLast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hey, I helped spark a thread!
I usually kill them, I am flattered (I'm the one who made the rule, not the exception).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. It has to do with the word "prove"
which in this instance, means to test.

In printing, a "proof" is a test-run. To "proof-read" is to examine something closely.

You test a rule by testing for exceptions to it. The phrase would be clearer by saying "it's the exception that tests the rule".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. By this token...
...would that mean that AC/DC sucked on Back in Black and thereafter according to the person who said that this exception proved the rule? I don't quite understand. If the exception tests the rule, and the rule passes the test, then that would mean that the exception is not an exception. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. The best explanation I've seen of this . .
. . . is that seeing mention of an exception tells you there has to be a rule for the exception to be an exception to.

For example, if a college catalog says, "Freshmen with Advanced Placement standing will be allowed to take upper-level courses," you known it means there is normally a rule that Freshmen *aren't* allowed to take those courses.

Of course, I've never been sure if this explanation is the true one or merely the cleverest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 20th 2024, 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC