Arnold - everyone cannot screw in front of others

The California Republican added that not every muscleman participated in the gang bang, "just the guys who can fuck in front of other guys. Not everybody can do that. Some think that they don't have a big-enough cock, so they can't get a hard-on."

NO TO Despots, NO to Treason, NO to RECALL!

Really? Welcome to Bill's World.

Does anybody have a link?

In my biology classes, it didn't look as though size alone was a determining factor for simply "getting a hard-on"! :eyes:

Was he thinking of "Plato's Retreat West" when he gave this interview?:eyes:

Just what WAS Ahhnold thinking when he gave this one? :crazy:

"Your next governator"? Oh, California Duers, I really DO hope you all can stop THAT line from coming true this October. Do it for my wife--Oct. 7 is her birthday!:D

:kick:

B-)

:puke:

I think he is referring to the fact that some men are so hung up over the (lack of) size of their penis that they are inable to acheive erection. It's a mental thing...I think.

Or, he could just be a blockhead. :-)

It's TRUE TOO!

What's the problem?

I've had a similar problem before - but it was because the woman I was with was married. :o :spank: My conscience took over, dammit!

... Arnie's assuming too much. he's assuming (a) that anyone who didn't participate, refrained only because of inability; and (b) that inability must have been due to small size.

those are unjustified assumptions. some of the men might well have thought the "gang-bang" was immoral. or they might have refrained out of (gasp!) faithfulness to their wives or girlfriends. or if they couldn't get it up, it might have been because the whole scene was disgusting. i know ***i*** wouldn't be turned on by the idea of humping some girl who'd just been had by another man, let alone by a group of men. or who knows, maybe the girl was not attractive. some men have standards.