|
Edited on Thu Dec-23-04 12:05 AM by HypnoToad
Not to mention bloody expensive. :evilgrin:
I wouldn't be able to do film with my neurological conditions (it's amazing what 10 years can do to one's ability to twiddle with intricate details)
Seems more fun to capture the film, run IVTC and other filters as needed, and work from there.
Heck, even 3:2 pulldown can be very much fun as I recently experimented with an old "Doctor Who" story and the results were overall quite good (PAL to telecine back to PAL after IVTC then to a NTSC transfer to some atypical 3:2 settings... 6 hours later, voila!).
Indeed, the ersatz video fluidity is sweet. Much better than the bogus film effect more people want to try these days because it doesn't even begin to look like film; only choppy video. Yuck.)
|