Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is there a future in the job market for video program editors?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 11:51 PM
Original message
Is there a future in the job market for video program editors?
Getting experienced with my own advanced hobby projects (which I hope to put to profitable use as selling my body is out of the question), I find myself more fascinated with video editing/syncing/production. Is this a field that's worth getting into, at all?

Thx!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. No idea what the editing job market is like
but I love editing video and film. I took some film classes in my last year of college and the most fun I had making my (very stereotypical) student film was editing it. Film is much harder to edit, but since it's a destructive process chopping up the the film you have to pay very close attention to detail.

What software do you use? I gave up on Premiere about 4 years ago and went to Sony's Vegas Video. I've never used Avid in practice, but it seems to be the norm in professional shops. Honestly I think Vegas is better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I primarily use Premiere right now. High-end and eminently flexible.
Edited on Thu Dec-23-04 12:05 AM by HypnoToad
Not to mention bloody expensive. :evilgrin:

I wouldn't be able to do film with my neurological conditions (it's amazing what 10 years can do to one's ability to twiddle with intricate details)

Seems more fun to capture the film, run IVTC and other filters as needed, and work from there.

Heck, even 3:2 pulldown can be very much fun as I recently experimented with an old "Doctor Who" story and the results were overall quite good (PAL to telecine back to PAL after IVTC then to a NTSC transfer to some atypical 3:2 settings... 6 hours later, voila!).

Indeed, the ersatz video fluidity is sweet. Much better than the bogus film effect more people want to try these days because it doesn't even begin to look like film; only choppy video. Yuck.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC