Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rather''s lifetime of service is nullified by one minor screw-up while ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
seeker4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 09:03 AM
Original message
Rather''s lifetime of service is nullified by one minor screw-up while ...
Rather''s lifetime of service is nullified by one minor screw-up while W''s lifetime of screw-ups are validated by a bunch of ditto heads. --GeneOrtiz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Very clever!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. no one has proved the memos to be false.
there was no screwup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. Agreed...
also the MSM ran the Rather story, and still runs it, to give cover up to the real issue which is:
Did W legally serve in the National Guard?

Where are the reporters?
This story is dead and the MSM helped kill it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. Saw a good analysis on Media Matters
Sorry, don't have the link, but I'm sure you can find it at www.mediamatters.org

But, several years back, CBS & 60 Minutes rushed a story on the air using a very questionable person as its source who revealed very embarrassing information about then president Bill Clinton. This woman, Kathleen Willey, was later proven unreliable & a liar. However, there was no investigation by CBS and/or 60 Minutes, nobody was fired and there was no public apology. With Rather's story, nothing was denied or disproved about the main charges, just one witness that was 'icing on the cake' was not vetted as thoroughly as he should have been.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. In the context of the times...
... Willey's being thrust into the news was highly political--further evidence from the far right wing of Clinton's moral turpitude, and, as you say, there was absolutely no self-examination on CBS's part about politicizing the news.

In the case of Mary Mapes, her chief crime seems to have been "politicizing the news" by introducing Bill Burkett to the Kerry campaign. As she herself admits, it was a mistake, but was incidental to the facts of the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. She was forged!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. It doesn't matter
Edited on Mon Jan-17-05 10:21 AM by EstimatedProphet
The truth about W's service doesn't matter.
Whether CBS used questionable tactics against Clinton doesn't matter.
Dan Rather's longstanding career doesn't matter.
The only thing that matters is that CBS tried to say something about Bush. That is a thoughtcrime and all of CBS should be destroyed. Bush must be protected at all costs. Bush is perfect in every way. Bush is better than everyone else. Bush was there on 9/11 and is now above reproach about anything forever. All of humanity must now bow down to Our Savior Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC