|
To tell the truth, I think it'd feel a little weird to have 'intimate moments' with a woman built like that. Not that physicality is the end-all and be-all of attraction, but I think even those of us who have some degree of 'feminist' sensibility would be perhaps suffering some kind of performance anxiety being with a woman whose male-associated secondary sexual characteristics (muscle mass) far outstrip our own. Like some kind of supernormal thing: if a woman was well muscled, even more than most males, it'd perhaps be one thing, but the women above are muscled up to a human extreme.
But, really, it's hard to say until it happens. I knew a champion female bodybuilder, 20 years ago, who was (although a little less bulky and stocky than the women above) pretty gorgeous and I'm not sure that the fact that her muscles were bigger than mine would have much held me back if she indicated receptivity to pollenization. I'm not the proverbial "98-pound-weakling" of Charles Atlas ads, but her muscles were bigger than mine and I still thought she was a foxy lady.
But, given that I don't find extremely bulked-up males (I'm talking the really, really extreme ones here, the champion kind) attractive, and wouldn't want to look that way myself, it's not all that surprising that I'm not especially turned on by women built along the same lines.
And, not to get too close to the thread-locking line here, I've had my head squeezed pretty darned hard by contraction certain larger adductor muscles (not saying where, for this thread's sake) on far less muscular women, at the moment of truth, and I'd be afraid to put my favorite noggin in a walnut-cracker with this kind of muscular power on tap. :o
|