Stone: Hillary too sexy to win White House

Stone: Hillary too sexy to win White House

(Daily Telegraph)
Updated: 2006-03-30 09:40


Actress Sharon Stone has warned Hillary Rodham Clinton to stay out of the 2008 US presidential race, saying the New York senator and former first lady is too sexy to win back the keys to the White House.


Actress Sharon Stone

Stone, 48, who appears naked in a soon-to-be-released sequel to the provocative 1992 sex thriller Basic Instinct, said Senator Clinton had an intimidating sexuality that would cost her votes.

"I think Hillary Clinton is fantastic, but I think it is too soon for her to run (for president)," Stone said in the latest edition of Hollywood Life magazine.

"A woman should be past her sexuality when she runs. Hillary still has sexual power and I don't think people will accept that. It's too threatening."


snip


http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2006-03/30/content_556144.htm

"A woman should be past her sexuality when she runs. Hillary still has sexual power and I don't think people will accept that. It's too threatening."

first, *past her sexuality* ??? :cry: i don't like that. When does that happen? I want to know - NOW!!!

second, does it matter that she's a woman? Can a man still have sexual power? In recent history, I'd say Bill Clinton had/has sexual power and so did Kennedy, just to name a couple. Why is it different?

This reminds me of the other thread about the US not being able to handle a single president. And it's probably true. What's wrong with US ???

:wtf:

but, I don't think she'd be seriously considered on the Republican side...

"I'm too sexy for this house
too sexy for this house
too sexy for the White House baby!"

If you saw last week's clip of her on The Daily Show, going on about her latest nude scene in (Israel?), you might see where I'm coming from.

i'm happy to disregard this latest installment.

and i kinda want Hilary in the White House just so Bill can wonder what she's doing in the Oval Office. ;)