Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some architects and builders should not be allowed to build homes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 08:02 AM
Original message
Some architects and builders should not be allowed to build homes
Mr. B took me house shopping (this is his hobby..we never buy anything...we just neb nose around)..


What is it with some of the ugly houses.....???

They put useless porches on the homes...that have no room for a chair let alone for someone to turn around...
then they put weird "accent features" on the roof...a small triangle in the middle of the roofline...that just doesn't seem right...

So tell me...why!!!!

I see this more on what is considered "new and affordable"...but you can still build an affordable home without making it hideous...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. My condolences!
Edited on Thu Jun-07-07 08:59 AM by Drum
Though economically I'll probably never buy or build a house of my own, it doesn't mean I don't do plenty of looking, and I agree with your OP. Plenty of houses look good on paper or seem like they're filled/covered with "nice touches," but are indeed cluttered or schizo or unlivable.

A few years ago, I happened on a great little book (see below) and read it with growing appreciation. Witold Rybczynski is an architect/write/teacher/critic who has some wonderful things to say about our personal relation to our architecture, especially the home. I'd really recommend this book: The Most Beautiful House in the World. It's a short read, but is informative, charming, and best of all will reassure you that you aren't crazy in seeking something simple and appropriate in your living space.

Good luck in your search!


:hi:



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Most_Beautiful_House_in_the_World
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witold_Rybczynski
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. thanks for the links...I will check it out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RubyDuby in GA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Tell me about it - I work at an architectural firm
The owner of said firm spent about 3 years designing his own McMansion and then redrew it as it was being built.

Why must they always try to reinvent the wheel???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Very definition of "MacMansion"
Edited on Thu Jun-07-07 12:04 PM by supernova
I can't take credit for this, but I read an architectural article a while ago about when a "home" deserves the MacMansion label.

The author decided it was because the building has overly ornate elements from different styles that clearly were never meant to be squashed together on one building. All this in an effort to say: luxury, first class, affluence, .... I'VE ARRIVED.

Instead the Cape Cod dormer windows and widow's walk, the Victorian filigree door-frame, the bay window jutting into the minuscule front porch, all really fairly shout "I'm so confused!! I'm trying WAY TOO HARD TO IMPRESS you with my newly-found wealth to be anything more than a monstrosity.

What self-respecting architect really enjoys designing these crapily designed homes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I can't imagine anyone would want to take credit for them
they are just suburban eyesores...

and what is sad is that they can command prices from $250K and up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-07-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. Part of the reason I ONLY want a house 50 years old or older.
I can fix what's wrong with those--the solid construction is what I am buying.
ANd the potential for mature trees....
WHAT is with putting houses RIGHTNEXTTOEACHOTHERSOICANSEETHENEIGHBORUSINGTHELOO ?
Drives me CRAZY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC