Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Yahoo stupid headline - High blood sugar level during pregnancy puts newborn at risk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 06:43 PM
Original message
Yahoo stupid headline - High blood sugar level during pregnancy puts newborn at risk
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070622/ap_on_he_me/diabetes_pregnancy


I didn't know newborns could be pregnant!

Lord, they start young these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. They corrected the title, but don't worry: The article's content remains obtuse:
The higher the mother's blood sugar, the more risk for the newborns, the study found. Researchers took into account obesity, age and family history of diabetes and still found the mother's blood sugar independently affected the infant's size and health.


Well, duh. It's the relative condition of the mother at the time of pregnancy. Her family isn't linked in any way shape or form. The woman's family history adds a preponderance to the possibility the woman will likely contract diabetes at some point, but at the time of pregnancy is the sole issue - if she does not have diabetes or high blood sugar during pregnancy, there is no relevant issue.

They could also poll 1000 people to find a popular answer to something. That only remains valid for 1000 people. Compared to finding out how all 300 million Americans feel, a poll asking 1000 Americans is grossly underwhelming and as such inaccurate. Therefore, the study making this claim is suspect also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sadly, I think they recycle these titles.
Because I've seen this one before. Not sure if it was the same article or the same study, but it's still been part of their "new" before.

Sometimes it's almost as funny as watching a teleprompter in a bar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC