Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Britain To Delete The Term "Prostitute" From Law Books

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:26 PM
Original message
Britain To Delete The Term "Prostitute" From Law Books
Britain to delete term "prostitute" from law books

Thu Jun 28, 9:18 AM ET

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain is proposing to remove the term "prostitute" from the criminal statutes because it carries too much stigma. Instead, a new bill that the Justice Ministry has drafted refers simply to persons who sell sex persistently -- defined as twice or more in three months.

"We just wanted to remove the stigma of the label 'common prostitute'," said a spokeswoman for the Justice Ministry. "It's been around since 1824, so it was a bit outdated. It just wasn't really helpful to label people."

The new bill introduces measures to try to get sex workers out of the industry, and in effect decriminalizes prostitution for those who are not considered persistent.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070628/od_nm/britain_prostitute_dc


*** - If you're a prostitute and you can only close the deal twice or more every three months.... you might as well be married.

Of course I'm sure that its also occurred to others that the best solution here is to just rename prostitutes: "POLITICIANS." Except they'd have to change the law and increase the number of times the "politician" sells themselves in a three-month period for it to make any sense......


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Strumpet? Trollop? Harlot? Red petticoat? Doxy?
Don't forget Presstitutes. :evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Lady of the Evening
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idgiehkt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. "People who sell sex persistently"?
She sells sea shells...

Sex worker might be more concise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. 4x a year? They just created a quota.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Might as well be married? Then it'd be even less than that.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. is that like McDonalds trying to remove the word "McJob"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. The word prostitute carries too much stigma.
And.....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Fuego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. How about "Erotic services contractor"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedStateShame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. They're just using the modern term in Britain: Tony Blair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC