Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

deleted

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:36 AM
Original message
deleted
Edited on Mon May-19-08 10:47 AM by FarceOfNature
some people need to lay off fucking GD-P. and people wonder why oh fucking forget it. enjoy your self righteousness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. self delete
Edited on Mon May-19-08 10:48 AM by FarceOfNature
guess I'm not allowed to comment on anything without screening it with the Shrill Brigade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's sad that women are defined by their looks.
Those were good strong women and you defining them as "ugly prudes" says more about you than them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. *yawn*
Edited on Mon May-19-08 10:44 AM by FarceOfNature
on edit: so are men. It's basic animalism. I'm sure you NEVER spend money on clothes to look nice, right? I mean, we should all just crawl around in sacks and never take baths because people should respect us for our MINDS right? Well listen, you can't change basic human biology. You can apply as many filters as you want to try to force people to not value physical attraction but in the end, the only one you're convincing is yourself. Sorry. You're wasting your energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Are you at all familiar with who they were?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I don't care if they are the wives of jesus.
in this context all they are were Prohibitionist prudes. And I didn't name the pic, so thanks for that. Honestly, get over yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Yeah, I am wasting my engergy as you're clearly a sexist asshole
who doesn't judge women on their values, morals or accomplishments... or even care to find out what those are. Just point and laugh because they aren't "hot".

Idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Goeth thou, girl!
:yourock:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. but she is a feminist...
didnt you know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. I know you don't care. But I do. Here's a bit about the Women's Temperance Union
When husbands controlled the family finances, their drunkenness was a threat to women and family. The "ugly prudes" were a group of women working towards social reform and working for temperance and prohibition.

Excessive use of alcohol destroyed the lives of many women who faced drunken husbands. The crusade against alcohol was a protest by women, in part, of their lack of civil rights. Women could not vote. In most states women could not have control of their property or custody of their children in case of divorce. There were no legal protections for women and children, prosecutions for rape were rare, and the state-regulated "age of consent" was as low as seven.

Most local political meetings were held in saloons from which women were excluded. At the end of the 19th century Americans spent over a billion dollars on alcoholic beverages each year, compared with $900 million on meat, and less than $200 million on public education.

By 1894, under "home protection" the WCTU was endorsing women's suffrage. By 1896, 25 of the 39 departments of the WCTU were dealing with non-temperance issues. However, temperance, especially in terms of alcohol., tobacco, and other drugs, was the force that bound the WCTU's social reforms together. To promote its causes, the WCTU was among the first organizations to keep a professional lobbyist in Washington, D. C.

The WCTU has proposed, supported, and helped establish:

  • protection of women and children at home and work
  • women's right to vote
  • shelters for abused women and children
  • the eight-hour work day
  • equal pay for equal work
  • founding of kindergartens
  • assistance in founding of the PTA
  • federal aid for education
  • stiffer penalties for sexual crimes against girls and women
  • uniform marriage and divorce laws
  • dress reform
  • travelers' aid
  • prison reform and police matrons
  • women police officers
  • homes and education for wayward girls
  • promotion of nutrition
  • pure food and drug act
  • legal aid
  • labor's right to organize
  • passive demonstrations and world peace


They are not "ugly", the people who point and laugh at them however, are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC