Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Star Trek

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 08:49 PM
Original message
Poll question: Star Trek
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Where's the "Haven't seen it, not that interested" choice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkTirade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Or the 'Haven't seen it, might get around to it" one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah, that would work for me too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie and algernon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. good and fun, but not great
I might see it again when it comes out on DVD and will probably watch it when it's on TV, but not about to see it in theaters again or buy the DVD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kinda liked it as a movie; utterly abhor it as Star Trek
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. My sentiments exactly. It does not feel like Trek. Now, I may be a purist,
Edited on Sat May-09-09 09:32 PM by Deja Q
but I am a genre purist - not just a franchise purist. If they want to make it "Trek", the soul of "Trek" must be there. Not just the copyrighted images and character names. Same for any other series, if somebody wants to revive it for modern or future audiences. That is the one thing that MUST remain true. Otherwise it's not worth the time or effort.

As a generic action movie, it's great. But then, generic action movies are a dime per dozen and offer nothing substantial.

As sci-fi it's pretty good -- the time travel bit isn't bad and in some ways is clever, given what they're trying to do (though it's reminiscent of the Voyager series finale only not as cornily optimistic)...

As Trek? It isn't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GaYellowDawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. This is honestly not sarcasm...
Would you be willing to define what the "soul of Trek" is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. the soul of Trek
Flying through space while sitting in a barcalounger in front of a big screen TV while a cute blonde in a miniskirt waits on you hand and foot.

It was light years ahead of its time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GaYellowDawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Well, that...
would truly be where no man has gone before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Liked it a lot
The script could have been tighter (another film that came out of the oven too early because of the WGA strike) and the jokes were very broad and didn't all land.

On the whole, though, it felt fresh, which is not something I thought I'd ever say about Star Trek again. The cast was terrific and all found their own readings on the parts (which was by no means a given), the FX were spectacular and too much to take in at one viewing, the pacing and editing were deliciously brisk, and it had so much of the angry, horny, clumsy, drunken, impertinent passion of TOS that it was hard to resist. I'm going again next week.

"You okay, Jim? How do you feel?"

"Young. I feel young."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleTouch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. Saw it today. Absolutely loved it!
If you can get your mind around the classic characters not looking like themselves (which was a bit of a mental stretch for me, admittedly), it's a fantastic movie that hits every correct note. Lots of references to past incidents, significant quotes, and familiar character interactions, plus of course some new twists. During the first half or so of the movie I found myself comparing what I was seeing with what I remembered from the classic episodes, and thinking "No, that can't happen, that doesn't work, because in fact we know this-and-such happened...." but I was accepting it as a reboot of sorts and wouldn't let it ruin my enjoyment of the movie. But lest you think they've totally botched the continuity, don't be - it's explained, and everything fits, and all the discord was resolved.

Of the new actors, Kirk and Chekov look least like "themselves", but I was able to live with it. The others are dead-on.

I read one review a while back that called this movie the best one since "Wrath of Khan." I'm inclined to agree. I won't post spoilers, but if you're at all a Star Trek fan, don't miss this!


Okay, two tiny sort-of mini-spoilers:


(spoiler space)





















Look for the incident that mirrors the "transparent aluminum" bit in Star Trek IV. Just a cute little tribute to times past, if you catch it, though it does set up a small temporal paradox. Who really discovered the formula?

And

While I already knew Uhura's first name (from Nichelle Nichols herself, no less), I didn't know how Bones got the name Bones - and here we finally see where that came from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. reply to the mini spoilers, leaving space

Space










the








final







frontier






I caught the transparent aluminum bit, and loved it immediately. My brother, not as big a Trek fan as I am, missed it, but understood the reference when we were talking about the movie on the way home.

Another reference in the same bit to Admiral Archer's prized beagle. I loved that, and it got a few knowing laughs from the audience.



















Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Where is "Never liked it, never will, but glad others like it" option?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-09-09 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. LOVED IT!
Took a while to quit expecting to see the Original Series cast, though!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-10-09 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
13. I just saw it, pretty good.
Edited on Sun May-10-09 01:29 AM by edbermac
Quinto and Pine were very believable, though Quinto was a shade better as Spock. Pine had a lot of Kirk's swagger as the film progressed.

Sulu, McCoy, Chekov and Scotty characters were pretty fun. Nimoy still has it as the older Spock.

The Spock/Uhuru relationship was kind of odd and Bana as the bad guy was a pretty lame villian. Khan would beat his ass without breaking a sweat.
The planet Vulcan scenario was pretty jarring.

And the FX were just fair, IMO. I think a lot of the FX on the ST TV shows are far better! Way too fast moving in this film. Nothing wrong with
slowing them down, like in the first film ST: The Motion Picture.

B+ to an A- for my rating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC