Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Natalie Portman: Can she act or not?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Mike 03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:12 PM
Original message
Natalie Portman: Can she act or not?
Edited on Thu May-14-09 07:15 PM by Mike 03
I apologize for the superficiality of this post, but I need to escape reality.

There have been some posts here about poor, even wretched, performances by highly regarded actors, and her name came up.

I have two sisters who think her performance in Mike Nichols film CLOSER was superb beyond words, and I think it was decent. I think her performance in THE PROFESSIONAL was excellent.

What I wrote the other night, to the best of my ability to recall, is that she is basically terrible in the Star Wars trilogy, other than perhaps a handful of scenes in REVENGE OF THE SITH.

She is young, and it is too soon, I think, to make any grand assertions about whether she is great, good or awful, but my point, my conclusion, is not that Natalie Portman cannot act, but that George Lucas cannot direct.

Look at his films. He is a terrible director. They are technically brilliant, but they are not ever notable for the acting.

AMERICAN GRAFFITI was a fluke.

Look at the performance of Harrison Ford in RETURN OF THE JEDI. It is the worst performance in the history of science fiction films.

To paraphrase some co-writers of mine who ran a website about film criticism, Lucas is fascinated by his toys to the exclusion of consideration for his actors. And that is why the robots deliver better performances than the living human beings.

I'm not saying this is good or bad; I'm just proffering it as my opinion.

Genius, Innovator? Yes.

Director? Horrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. She can act brilliantly when she has a non-Lucas director making her act badly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Lucas is a great producer, not a great director
..and there is some debate as to who actually directed AG - some would argue Copppola did most of the heavy lifting. That aside, the reason the Original Star Wars and American Graffiti worked was neither the directing nor the writing, but the production and the casting.

Portman can act, but she's down on the ability list of American actresses in her generation. Hillary Swank, Anne Hathaway, and Amy Adams can all act rings around her, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dugaresa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. i think she can
the actress I think is horrid is Halle Berry the idea that she got an Oscar still infuriates me.

Whoopee Goldberg deserved an Oscar for the Color Purple and for her performance in Corrina Corrina, but Halle gets it for that awful performance she gave?

Heck, I thought she was awful playing Dorothy Dandridge, it was a wonder Dorothy didn't wake up from the grave and thrash her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Lucas has talent; Portman has little.
Portman's best performance was in Leon: The Professional. Since then, she seems incapable of inhabiting her roles.

Lucas is a marvelous visual storyteller who would have been ideally suited for the Silent Era, as he admits he's the "King of the Cornball Dialogue."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
24. Yes on Portman, no on Lucas
Edited on Fri May-15-09 11:55 AM by LostinVA
All he has is a good story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes on Portman.
I've always thought Lucas was overrated as a director.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. I will burn in effigy anyone who speaks ill of Natalie Portman
Edited on Thu May-14-09 09:09 PM by Orrex
You've been warned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogtown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. I got your back, Orrex
The *NERVE* of some people...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcrush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. She is great in anything that isnt directed by Lucas.
Edited on Thu May-14-09 09:12 PM by rcrush
I think he almost killed her career. V for Vendetta proved she can act in Sci Fi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Everyone was terrible in Star Wars I-III, because those films SUCKED.
Such utterly lame dialogue. Direction? Utter SHITE.

There was a rumor that went around in, about 30 years ago...
a rumor that Lucas didn't write those scripts, that he stole them
from someone else and put his name on them.

I dismissed it at the time as just another urban legend.
But after seeing episodes I, II, and III, it's become clear to me
that Lucas doesn't have a fucking CLUE as to why episode IV was so great.

And that old rumor seems completely plausible to me these days.
Looks like some of the scripts weren't completely finished,
and Lucas sure as hell never finished them.
The dialogue just screams "first draft" to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. I doubt any actor on earth could make that dialogue sound good
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. Uhhh..yes.... V for Vendetta
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. Yeah, she did well as Evie, I thought. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
29. She's excellent when she had a good script... she was terrific in V
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Have you seen her in Closer? *spoilers*
Edited on Thu May-14-09 10:13 PM by Tuesday Afternoon
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0376541/

Director:Mike Nichols

Writers (WGA): Patrick Marber (play)
Patrick Marber (screenplay)


Smart-but-ineffectual journalist Dan "We use euphemisms!" cant decide between his girlfriend, loving-but-clingy waitress Alice, or his lover cold-but-intellectual photographer Anna. Anna herself cant decide between Dan and honest-but-thuggish "You're bloody gorgeous!" doctor Larry. The film, as Tarantino might put it, puts the four leading characters in a box and then takes them apart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. She's a better actor than Lucas is a director
but that's not saying much.

That said, I still love Natalie and her performances in The Professional and V for Vendetta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gardenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. Don't mess with Natalie Portman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorChode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. I never really noticed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mudoria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. I get your point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lethe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
14. no, she is limited as an actress
she seems to have only two modes: the normal mode and the natalie portman crying mode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
15. Lucas' problem
Edited on Fri May-15-09 01:13 AM by pokerfan
is that he hates actors. He would populate an entire movie with CGI characters if he could get away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rob H. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
19. Lucas can't write halfway-decent dialog to save his life, either
I have fond memories of seeing the first Star Wars as a kid and it wasn't until I saw the "enhanced re-release" in theaters years later that it hit me that Lucas appears to know fuck-all about how people actually talk. I read somewhere that during filming Lucas was getting on Harrison Ford's back about his performance and Ford told him, "George, you can write this shit, but you sure can't say it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. And, he REALLY can't write romantic dialog
Nor does he have good instincts: he loved Jar-Jar, was surprised Darth Maul was so successful, and cut teh very, very interesting and important arc from "Sith" about Padme's role as a foundeing member of teh Resistance (it's in the novel).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rob H. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. True!
It's probably a cliché to use a phrase like "cringe-inducing," but the scenes between Christiansen and Portman were just painful to watch. It was another one of those "Who the hell talks like that?!?" moments.

As for Jar-Jar and Darth Maul, it pissed me off that Lucas created one of the most badass-looking villains in the Star Wars films and then gave him so little screen time while beating us over the head with Jar-Jar every chance he got.

I think Lucas is one of those directors who needs to be told, "Just because you can do a thing doesn't necessarily mean you should do it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
av8rdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
20. This video should erase any doubts about her talent (Warning: NSFW, not family - friendly)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suzy creemcheeze Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
21. She is a beautiful presence...
Edited on Fri May-15-09 11:45 AM by suzy creemcheeze
Many "actors" are actually living off their incredible charisma. The first time I saw Portman was the wonderful film, "Beautiful Girls." She was around fourteen and had a luminous quality about her. It's not simply being good-looking; those types are a dime a dozen. No, it is magic. You can talk about people like Julia Roberts and Jack Nicholson, who are basically known for their personalities or auras. A real actor disappears into roles. When you see Nicholson in a film, he is playing up that Jack personality. Meryl Streep: ACTOR. Daniel Day-Lewis: ACTOR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
23. She and Ewan McGregor did brilliantly with awful scripts
Edited on Fri May-15-09 11:54 AM by LostinVA
Though not the best actress of her generation, she is a very good actress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
27. I think so
She's more than just a pretty actress. Her role as Padme is not considered her best, and I liked her in that role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wickerwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
28. Yes, but what she can't do is pick decent scripts.
She kicked ass in the Professional. She was very good in V for Vendetta and The Other Boleyn Girl. She's made a string of total stinkers like Anywhere But Here and Where the Heart Is.

I think she went through a long phase where she was being managed badly but she's picking better scripts now that she's matured a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC