Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's I.Q. - Can anyone vouch for the accuracy of this document?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
NightTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:33 AM
Original message
Bush's I.Q. - Can anyone vouch for the accuracy of this document?

Found this in my e-mail box tonight. No idea if it's true, or even if the Lovenstein Institute even exists. But didja think that was gonna stop me from posting it to the Lounge? Stop being silly! :-)

------------------------------------------------------------
G.W. Bush Ranks Lowest I.Q. in 50 Years of U.S. Presidents


In a report published Monday, the Lovenstein Institute of Scranton, Pennsylvania, detailed its findings of a four-month study of the intelligence quotient of President George W. Bush. Since 1973, the Lovenstein Institute has published its research to the educational community on each new president, which includes the famous "IQ" report among others. The Lovenstein Institute has rated twelve presidents over the past 50 years, from F.D. Roosevelt to G.W. Bush, based on the following factors scholarly achievements, writings that they produced without aid of staff, their ability to speak with clarity, and several other psychological factors, which were then scored using the Swanson/Crain system of intelligence ranking. The study determined the following IQs of each president as accurate to within five percentage points:

In order by presidential term: In I.Q. order:


147. Franklin D. Roosevelt (D) 182. William J. Clinton (D)
132. Harry Truman (D) 175. James E. Carter (D)
122. Dwight D. Eisenhower (R) 174. John F. Kennedy (D)
174. John F. Kennedy (D) 155. Richard M. Nixon (R)
126. Lyndon B. Johnson (D) 147. Franklin D. Roosevelt (D)
155. Richard M. Nixon (R) 132. Harry Truman (D)
121. Gerald Ford (R) 126. Lyndon B. Johnson (D)
175. James E. Carter (D) 122. Dwight D. Eisenhower (R)
105. Ronald Reagan (R) 121. Gerald Ford (R)
98. George Bush (R) 105. Ronald Reagan (R)
182. William J. Clinton (D) 98. George Bush (R)
91. George W. Bush (R) 91. George W. Bush (R)


The six Republican presidents of the past 50 years had an average IQ of 115.5, with President Nixon having the highest at 155. President G.W. Bush rated the lowest of all the Republicans with an IQ of 91. The six Democrat presidents had IQs with an average of 156, with President Clinton having the highest IQ, at 182. President Lyndon B. Johnson was rated the lowest of all the Democrats with an IQ of 126. No president other than Carter (D) has released his actual IQ, 176. Comments made concerning the specific testing of President GW Bush include:


His low ratings are due to his apparent difficulty with command of the English language in public statements, his limited use of vocabulary (6,500 words for Bush versus an average of 11,000 words for other presidents), his lack of scholarly achievements other than a basic MBA, and an absence of any body of work which could be studied on an intellectual basis.


The complete report documents the methods and procedures used to arrive at these ratings, including depth of sentence structure and voice stress confidence analysis.


"All the Presidents prior to George W. Bush had a least one book under their belt, and most had written several white papers during their education or early careers. Not so with President Bush," Dr. Lovenstein said. "He has no published works or writings, which made it more difficult to arrive at an assessment. We relied more heavily on transcripts of his unscripted public speaking."


The Lovenstein Institute of Scranton Pennsylvania think tank includes high caliber historians, psychiatrists, sociologists, scientists in human behavior, and psychologists. Among their ranks are Dr. Werner R. Lovenstein, world-renowned sociologist, and Professor Patricia F. Dilliams, a world-respected psychiatrist.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Snopes
Edited on Wed Aug-13-03 12:47 AM by nothingshocksmeanymo
on edit : Snopes debunked it 2 years ago when it came out

http://www.democraticunderground.com/duforum/DCForumID12/2815.html#18
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corarose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. My Cat has a higher IQ then the Piece Of Shit!
My Cat's are smarter then Jr. They at least know how to go to the bathroom on their own. I bet Jr still has his Mommy wipe his butt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blessedleader Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. heehee...
nah, not true. . . the place doesn't exist, for one thing. . . Clinton is conveniently twice as smart as dubya (which also makes him the most brilliant person alive. . . can't say there are very many 180's walking around). . . and. . . Kennedy has an actual, genuine IQ score floating around, I think it's 116. . .

I was looking at this earlier, because I was curious if anyone had anything to say about Bush's IQ. . . and I found one conservative who was debunking this, the best he could do was say Bush was at 115, which is the exact score studies rank the average college graduate at. . . coincidence? ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Hey, mine is 165+ and I am a train wreck
I don't know if a high IQ would really be such an asset for the job of President. Some studies have indicated severe problems with socialization occur in the 160 and up range. Of course, some are brilliant and easy to get a long with--but I have not met them yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BushHasGotToGo Donating Member (146 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. This just hurts the credibility of our party
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. What hurts the party?
Edited on Wed Aug-13-03 12:52 AM by roughsatori
Someone posting a story and asking if it is true? Or the fact that the story is invented?

I don't see how either could hurt the Democratic Party. I mean they did not write it, and I see only positive in the fact that someone wants to know if something is true or not.

Here's a link that debunks the email:
http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bliq-bush.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BushHasGotToGo Donating Member (146 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The fact that it was invented
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. There is no logic in that assertion
You may know something that I don't about the production of this email. Maybe you know that some operatives of the Democratic party produced this, if so, provide your source. If not, I fail to see how this harms the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. How this harms the Democratic Party.
It doesn't hurt us from the inside, it hurts from the outside. (In a tiny, cumulative way) Ya know how everytime we see a repub spewing utter bullshit, we add another hash mark to the "Reasons Why Republicans Suck" column? This parody can be seen by repubs in the same manner. It doesn't matter if it was written by a Democrat to hurt bush or not. Some repubs will blame a dem for it.

Now, I've done many extensive calculations and triple checked the results regarding this particular issue. I've arrived at the conclusion that this harms the democratic party to exactly the same degree that geraldo rivera's mustache hurts repukes. ;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I just did more Google on this
It started at a JOKE website. Someone copied it from that site and that is how it began. The joke website has no party affiliation. I have however found Rightwing sources claiming that the "Left" invented this in an orchestrated manner, and that it hurt the veracity of the Dems. Hey, the Rightwingers are on your side in this debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devlzown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. According to Gore Vidal,
FDR couldn't even balance a checkbook. I'm not quite sure if that was due to his IQ level or the pitchers of martinis he drank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
11. I think he probably started life just short of 100
...which is normal. However, his 20+ years of extremely heavy alcohol abuse have had an effect.

If you want to read about his slurred speech, wandering gaze, lack of balance, swallowing difficulty, and cofabulation when he should be able to remember what really happened, try

http://www.healthcentral.com/mhc/top/000771.cfm

It's all right there, and it's called Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC