Anyone read the article about Franken's response to Faux?

thom1102

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Aug-13-03 08:20 AM
Original message

Anyone read the article about Franken's response to Faux?

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030813/ap_on_en_tv/publishing_franken_lawsuit_6

Fox alleged that Franken was "either intoxicated or deranged" when he attacked the network and conservative host Bill O'Reilly at an April press correspondents dinner. The lawsuit also says that Franken has been described as "increasingly unfunny."

As far as the personal attacks go," Franken responded, "when I read `intoxicated or deranged' and `shrill and unstable' in their complaint, I thought for a moment I was a Fox commentator.

"And by the way, a few months ago, I trademarked the word `funny.' So when Fox calls me `unfunny,' they're violating my trademark. I am seriously considering a countersuit."

I can't wait for that book to come out!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

flyingfish

(260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Aug-13-03 08:22 AM
Response to Original message

1. Faux did Franken a HUGE favor

Any publicity is always good publicity.
And those immature comments just make Faux look bad.

Franken's comeback is classic. Nothing a "C" political commentator would think up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Divernan

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Aug-13-03 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #1

7. Fox's whining personal slurs on Al are legally gratuitous.

Edited on Wed Aug-13-03 09:00 AM by Divernan

The issue before the court in the suit is whether Fox should have been allowed to trademark the phrase "fair and balanced", and if so, whether Franken's use of the phrase violated the trademark.

All the cry-baby, personal attacks on Al's character and talent are totally irrelevant to the court's consideration and are likely to insult and anger a judge who reasonably expects the lawyers for any party to control the language in legal pleadings and not indulge their client's vitriolic nature. Judges are big on the dignity of their courtroom.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Cha

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Aug-13-03 08:23 AM
Response to Original message

2. Thanks for this! Last night was the first time I had heard Al

was being sued by faux news and this is perfect response!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

The Zanti Regent

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Aug-13-03 08:37 AM
Response to Original message

3. Al is crying all the way to the bank

How stupid can the 19th Century Fox fools be?????

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

GOPisEvil

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Aug-13-03 08:42 AM
Response to Original message

4. I'm sure there is a "decpetive trade practices" suit in here somewhere...

After all, it would be quite easy to prove that FauxNews is FAR from fair and balanced, and that this constitutes consumer fraud. :evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

hippiechick

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Aug-13-03 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #4

12. I'm guessing that the terms 'fair' and 'balanced'

...are so widely used in various trademarks for all kinds of goods and services (http://www.uspto.gov/main/trademarks.htm) that there would be a small likelihood that Faux could get sole registration on it, unless they agreed to only use the terms in tandem with their name, ie, "Fox News Fair And Balanced" - which can obviously be proven as disingenuous and/or 'false advertising'.

There may be a case here for a real go-getter of a trademark attorney to get the USPTO to cancel Faux's registration, if they indeed do have it.

(I work in a trademark law dept at an insurance co. but don't know nearly enough of the legal idiosynracies.)

:hippie:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Divernan

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Aug-13-03 08:43 AM
Response to Original message

5. I just pre-ordered the book at Barnes&Noble.

I would have bought it when it came out, but if we pre-order, it gets Al's sales numbers up immediately following Faux's suit - gives me a pre-order laugh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

pansypoo53219

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Aug-13-03 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #5

6. plus

ya make sure the title page has the fair and balanced part.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

trogdor

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Aug-13-03 09:11 AM
Response to Original message

8. Kinda funny that there is video and mp3 of that incident all over the net.

I take it this is the one where Franken calls bullshit on O'Really's claiming to have won a Peabody award, and he gets flustered and lashes out at Franken in the end and starts to sound...er...deranged (intoxicated maybe?). I'd love to be a fly on the ceiling in court when the defense plays it back for the jury. Every eye will roll.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

LuLu550

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Aug-13-03 09:48 AM
Response to Original message

9. Al called O'Reilly on his made-up working class roots, too

O'Reilly claims to have working class roots and says he grew up in Levittown, Long Island. Problem is, O'Reilly's dad was an exec and they lived in the more up-scale town of Westbury. When Al called him on it at the book conference, O'Reilly turned red and said he grew up in the "Westbury section of Levittown" which does not exist.
O'Reilly is so "truthful," he lies about his hometown!
LuLu

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

supernova

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Aug-13-03 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #9

11. Michael Kinsley

has called him on the carpet about his supposed blue collar roots too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

thom1102

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Aug-13-03 02:10 PM
Response to Original message

10. kick

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Sun May 12th 2024, 10:55 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.