Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did y'all know that King Henry the VIII died at 55 years of age.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
texanwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 10:48 PM
Original message
Did y'all know that King Henry the VIII died at 55 years of age.
I always thought he was much older.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. My dear texanwitch...
I had no idea he was that young.

Like you, I thought he was much older...

I think he had syphilis.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I am watching BBC series on Netflix.
The series is called Monarchy, very good.

I like history.

Old King Henry and his daughter Elizabeth changed the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. I just read a book
(not my usual fare) - called LONDON by Ed Rutherford. It's an historical fiction covering the entire "history" of London from before it existed up to after WWII. Learned a lot of things I didn't know about history!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Then you might really enjoy the book called "Sarum" - same author
that covers the whole history of Britain from the time of the caveman when it became an island all the way up to WWII by following about 5 families from the very beginning. Mostly it focuses on the area of Salisbury (originally called Sarum) but covers loosely the whole of the country. The ancient history was fascinating especially his depiction of the building of Stonehenge and the time of the Druids, Roman rule, Saxon invasion and especially those strange ancient burial mounds that are all over the place even still standing today. I'd never even heard of them before until reading this book.

I'll have to read "London" now since it sounds like much the same type of novel but focusing on a different area of Britain.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. I'm reading New York by Ed. Rutherford...it's really good as well! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I found this interesting website.
Edited on Sun May-29-11 12:01 AM by texanwitch
I think old Henry had alot of health problem, syphilis was one of them.

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-03-puzzle-henry-viii.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
6000eliot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Interesting, given the fact that he was responsible for
the first anti-gay law. He was also married 6 times and suffered a lot of stress, given the whole outlawing the Catholic Church and stealing all of their stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. If the Church would have let him remarry history would have be different.
The Catholic Church was the power in the world at that time.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Most historians disregard the suggestion that he might have had syphilis
His extreme obesity was largely responsible for his death along with his ulcerating leg wound, and more recently it is believed both he and his sister, Mary Tudor, likely had Type II diabetes that contributed much to their demise. His diet was terrible consisting of binge eating in his later years, and he subsisted mostly on fatty meats and rich desserts with very few vegetables.

Syphilis was a well known disease at the time, and there is nothing in the extensive notes of his physicians that indicate he had such symptoms. The rumors of his having syphilis likely were fed because of not only his abundance of wives and mistresses, he had sex with many women of "the lower orders" so to speak which monarchs simply didn't do. He not only did (and frequently), he practically flaunted these encounters and affairs with peasant women and low end prostitutes.

Given his lifelong terror of any illness, it's highly unlikely that he would go anywhere near anyone that exhibited the slightest hint of any disease or illness. He would never have touched anyone not scrupulously clean, and anyone he did have sex with was mostly likely examined by his physicians from tip to stern for any sign of anything out of the ordinary. People thought Henry was a kook for having every inch of whatever castle he was staying in liberally swabbed in every nook and cranny with soaps and various cleaning agents whenever any illness had swept through the community to kill any lingering "bad vapors". It was believed at the time that illness and disease was the result of bad "stuff" in the air (essentially, they weren't so far off the mark) but such "bad vapors" could be detected by a bad odor. Therefore, Henry's insistence that where ever he was staying had to be scrubbed clean after an illness had swept through when there were no bad odors indicating "bad vapors" of disease was looked upon as eccentric craziness one would be wise to keep their mouth shut about.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Physically he was much older. The STD did a number on him.
Most people of the time didn't live to 50.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. yep, but I spent a lot of time studying his whole reign
Fifty-five was a pretty good age at that time particularly considering they didn't know much of anything about medicines and didn't understand the connection between sanitation and disease.

Fifty-five was a pretty darn good age for him, too, considering his gargantuan weight and that disgusting pus weeping stinking leg wound he had for many years that no one could heal.

He was also what today we would call germaphobic. Illness and disease terrified and disgusted him. Whenever the slightest hint of any illness was going through the community he pulled up stakes where ever he was and relocated the court to some remote locale until all signs of it were gone (sans anyone with a hint of having the current illness regardless of who they were). He'd virtually hide from everyone while in the remote locale, and he was a man who positively thrived on perpetual entertainment.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. It wasn't the age. It was the mileage. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bikebloke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. He didn't age much in The Tudors.
;)

OK, forget the historical accuracy and enjoy the ride.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IcyPeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. LOVE the Tudors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Henry was hot looking in the Tudors.
I just finished watching the series.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luciferous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I watched it up until the death of Anne Boleyn and then lost interest.
But yeah, he was pretty hot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bikebloke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I still have the final season to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. And for most of that, he was married to Catherine of Aragon
1509-1533.

He crammed 5 wives into the last 14 years of his life.



dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. None of them took up that much of his time
Period as queen consort

Anne Boleyn: 1533-36

Jane Seymour: 1536-37

Anne of Cleves: 1539

Catherine Howard: 1540-42

Catherine Parr: 1543-47 (outlived him)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. actually sounds abt right to me, he exceeded his life expectancy of the day certainly
Edited on Sun May-29-11 12:27 PM by pitohui
55 was "much older" when life expectancy even up to 1900 for a man was around age 45

we have extremely unrealistic ideas of how long a person can be expected to live, absent modern medical technology, 55 is not young, it's well into late middle age since a person is officially old even today at 60 -- plenty of places around here start offering the senior discounts at age 55 to be honest

i have several friends who died in their mid 50s, and i mean in THIS century, if they find your arterial blockage in time to do a bypass you'll live 20 or 30 more years, but if you pass away suddenly in your sleep at age 52 (happened to TWO of my friends in a short period of time) you got no chance because the docs never got a chance to do their magic

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
18. Yes, he was way beyond the normal life expectancy of those days
as others have pointed out.
And remember, in those days, it was not unusual to die of any little old bacterial infection that today would be easily cured by antibiotics.
Even tooth decay could and would kill people in those days. (From bacterial infections that resulted.)
dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
22. Yes, as a Brit I learned a lot about him
In those days, even the rich tended to die young - even those who didn't get their heads chopped off; and poor people died even younger.

Thank goodness for modern medicine, sanitation and knowledge about diet, etc.

Henry's son Edward VI, who inherited the throne, died before his 16th birthday. His sister 'Bloody Mary' then became Queen. She died at 42. Her sister and successor Elizabeth 1 died at 69, which was considered as a great age in those days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. You know, "Bloody Mary" was no more nasty than both her father and sister.
But she gets the bad reputation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Except that she had hundreds of protestants burned at the sake, hence her name "Bloody Mary" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Yeah, but both her father and her sister killed more people....
where are their nicknames? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. The winners write the histories and print the labels. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Well, in defense of Elizabeth...
...many of the executions she ordered could easily be regarded as self defense.

When I read of her life, I am amazed she survived long enough to come to the throne. I can perfectly understand, even though I am an atheist, how she could remark on surviving long enough to be queen, "This is the Lord's doing, and it is marvelous in our eyes."

I say that around here whenever something remarkably good happens, and my boys kind of like it.

She was, overall, given her times, a great monarch, almost certainly the greatest of her age.

One of her legacies is our language itself. A monarch who can create a world in which Shakespeare could come of age can't be all bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Queen Elizabeth also funded exploring America.
The state of Virginia was nameed after her, the Virgin Queen because she never married.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. Here are a few reasons why Mary has the nickname and her father and sister don't
Edited on Wed Jun-01-11 12:57 AM by solara
Henry the 8th may have executed more people, but that was spread out over many years. Plus, the people he executed for political purposes were members of the nobility and upper class. The only time he executed a lot of commoners was after they rebelled during the Pilgrimage of Grace.

Elizabeth only executed people who had actually committed crimes, not for secretly being heretics, whereas Mary would have people investigated and executed merely for holding Protestant beliefs. It was also about -who- was executed during Mary's reign, not just how many. The noble or wealthy Protestants fled the country away from Mary's reach and so many of the people she went after were just common people with no real power or influence. So ultimately, Mary was seen as attacking her own people, the commoners.

Initially, Mary was not hated. She came to the throne on a tide of popularity. The people rose up en masse, to ensure that her right to the throne was recognized. Her policies lost her that popularity, and her marriage to Phillip of Spain is generally regarded as being a major blow to her popular support.

Mary's persecution of Protestants and her single minded desire to root out "heresy" continued to erode her public image. Then she drew England in to Spain's wars to please her husband even though the people were against it. The war was costly, both in terms of money and territory. The loss of Calais was a major blow to England as it was their last stronghold in France and had been English territory for over three hundred years.

So Mary was hated by the people, the commoners, and Henry and Elizabeth weren't - the people loved them in spite of the crap they did. And those are some of the reasons why Mary got the nickname and her father and sister did not.

(much of this explanation is by Lynsey on Yahoo)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Spread out over the years?
I think Henry outlived his welcome. He became a vile, murderous tyrant. Cruel for the sake of being cruel.

Elizabeth only murdered people who committed crimes? Well....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mudoria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
23. He died 54 years too late imo
And his father should have died at birth. Long live the Plantagenets!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Right on!
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
24. He became such a nasty character.
Really and truly, he was a despicable character. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
28. That leg injury probably did him in. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
31. I've outlived Henry! HA! Take that!
:hi:

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
32. Rotting toes and leg ulcers made him stink,
and it's said that people could smell him approaching. He must have really suffered.

He believed in the Divine Right of Kings, right? Who was the last English monarch who did?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
36. I thought he lived a ripe old age
Edited on Wed Jun-01-11 08:25 PM by brettdale
55 huh!

multi wives will do that to ya, just joking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC