Some views from the enemy:
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=%5CPolitics%5Carchive%5C200308%5CPOL20030826a.html<snip>
"Gen. Clark is a passionate, outspoken advocate of nation building," Hulsman said. Clark supports policies that haven't worked in Haiti, Somalia, Bosnia, Kosovo and also will not work in Afghanistan or Iraq, he added.
---
Maginnis added: "He's not Dwight Eisenhower...I don't see him as a viable candidate for the presidency at this juncture." Clark would make an effective vice president, defense secretary or secretary of state in any administration, he said.
</snip>
That's pretty hilarious. George W. Bush was a passionate, outspoken critic of nation building according to his own words before he got us into Afghanistan and Iraq.
If this is all they've got against Clark, then he looks like a pretty good candidate. Not Dwight Eisenhower? (who was primarily known for golfing and not being exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer, no offense to Ike who did play a large role in the defeat of the Axis powers)
If that's all they've got, I say, "Bring it on! (TM)"