At last the US press awakens

By Paul Krugman
NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE , NEW YORK
Monday, May 31, 2004,Page 9

Some news organizations, including The New York Times, are currently engaged in self-criticism over the run-up to the Iraq war. They are asking, as they should, why poorly documented claims of a dire threat received prominent, uncritical coverage, while contrary evidence was either ignored or played down.

But it's not just Iraq, and it's not just the Times. Many journalists seem to be having regrets about the broader context in which Iraq coverage was embedded: a climate in which the press wasn't willing to report negative information about US President George W. Bush.

People who get their news by skimming the front page, or by watching TV, must be feeling confused by the sudden change in Bush's character. For more than two years after Sept. 11, he was a straight shooter, all moral clarity and righteousness.

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/edit/archives/2004/05/31/2003157701

these wankers are setting their next situations.

I decided to watch CBS evening news for the first time in about a year, after some people here said they had changed. They had some piece on corruption with government money in the telecommunications business (I can't remember what exactly), and almost the whole time they were talking about it they showed an old video of Clinton and Gore installing fibre-optic cable in a school or something.

So even though the story was about business corruption, not government corruption, their aim was to associate the corruption story with CLINTON-GORE.

I thought it was so cheap. These people know exactly what they are doing, and they are no friend of the Democrats. So I won't turn on CBS news again.

and to hell with firms like EDS too.