Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Enron-driven reforms are unraveling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 02:47 PM
Original message
Enron-driven reforms are unraveling
Enron was the beginning, and now it's the end.
...

After six years as the avatar of reform, the lessons of Enron are being rolled back, the consequences overlooked, history rewritten to offer an air of legitimacy to the vacuous deals born in Smith Street hubris.

Long-expected decision
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court issued a long-expected decision in a case with direct bearing on Enron shareholders. The Supremes found that third parties can't be held liable in cases of fraud.

...

"They're basically providing escape routes for people who are going to be pursuing their own game at the expense of investors," said Stephen Arbogast, a finance professor at the University of Houston and author of Resisting Corporate Corruption: Lessons in Practical Ethics From the Enron Wreckage.

The cable company case
The case in question involved a cable company paying inflated prices for set-top boxes. The box makers, in turn, allegedly paid inflated prices for cable advertising. The whole scheme was designed to make everybody's numbers look better, according to a lawsuit filed by cable company investors.

...

The court's decision in the cable case comes at a time when some of Enron's biggest enablers are reporting record losses related to subprime mortgages.

From Enron playbook
...

LJM2's job was to buy Enron assets that were underwater and keep them off the company's balance sheet. Fastow got some of the top banks on Wall Street to invest in the deal by assuring them that as Enron's chief financial officer, he knew the deals inside and out.

Insider's knowledge...

With Enron, investment banks convinced the world that the process of sliding money around was a viable business. Now, as the mortgage crisis goes global, the world is paying the price.

Enablers' role irrelevant

The Supremes apparently see no problem with this. In their decision, the role of the enablers — no matter who they are — doesn't matter.

The box makers can't be held accountable because "deceptive acts were not communicated to the public."

That, of course, is the nature of deceptive acts. They're not deceptive if you tell everyone about them.

The real losers, though, aren't Enron's shareholders. They may not get their day in court, but they are getting a record settlement. This week, even as the Supreme Court was making sure a recovery like that never happens again, Enron's victims were told they would receive an average of almost $7 a common share.

It's a pittance compared with their losses, but it's a victory nonetheless.

The next victims in the next fraud won't be so lucky. With five pen strokes, the Supreme Court consigned the lessons of Enron to the dim halls of history.

Chron


Sorry for long post. Thought it was an interesting article to share.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Did we expect less of a Supreme Court who stole an election?
The RWers on the court should be impeached for failing to uphold the laws regarding fraud, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sorrywrongemail Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. It reminds me of how the antitrust law was treated
in the Progressive Era by the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazymans economics Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The definition of a self-regulated agency...
It's very important to remember that the markets are all self-regulated. These regulatory agencies established rules to ensure fair play. But they are not concerned with protecting the investors from the organizations, but to protect organizations from the investors. In the upcoming book, "Crazyman'$ Economics", I have determined that the true purpose of the regulatory commissions are:

o Make sure the exchanges are successful;
o Make sure the winners get their money;
o Make sure the losers can’t hold the brokers or exchanges liable;
o Make sure the brokers and exchanges are not required to keep any records negative to their success.

Remember that the markets don’t survive because you make money, they survive because you lose money. Winners attract losers, and the markets survive on the losers. But the markets don’t want to promote the fact that they need losers to survive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC