The A.M.T.: An Uninvited Guest of the Middle Class

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/29/business/yourmoney/29amtt.html?pagewanted=1

WHO, me? Rich?

F. Scott Fitzgerald may have gotten it wrong. In the eyes of the tax collector, at least, the rich are not so different from you and me.

Some 2.6 million taxpayers this filing season will be caught in a tax net that was never intended for them, and many millions more will have to spend time or pay a tax professional to establish, through complex calculations, that they have no extra tax liability.

The cause is the alternative minimum tax, which was inspired by a disclosure to Congress in 1969 that 155 wealthy Americans who earned at least $200,000 in 1966 paid no income tax. That led to the creation of a sort of parallel tax universe, intended to make sure that even the richest Americans with the most sophisticated tax advisers would pay something, no matter how cleverly they arranged their financial affairs.

Now, however, partly because the A.M.T. was not indexed for inflation, the decidedly nonrich are feeling the bite.

"It's getting the upper-middle-income people" already, said Gary C. Pokrant, a tax principal at the accounting firm of Reznick Fedder & Silverman in Bethesda, Md. "In coming years, it's going to get closer to the center of the middle class.

"The world ends then," Mr. Pokrant predicted. "People aren't going to tolerate that."

be to fix regular tax, make capital gains tax flat 25%, make investment income tax flat 25%, allow deductible tax free gains and interest of 10,000 in each category -

and double the income level point where the alt min tax begins.

If you assume (quite reasonably) that the tax is going to have to be cut back to relieve the middle class, the deficit picture suddenly becomes a *whole* lot worse.

Of course, the administration isn't telling us any of this.

effect - he will used that effect to pass it!