I note that there is NOT ONE anti-nuke with the courage or guts to call for the phase out of dangerous fossil fuels because of dangerous fossil fuel wars, which have constituted 100% of the wars fought in the last century.
Instead, the shit-for-brains anti-nuke industry, lead by pieces of shit like the Royal Dutch Shell apologist Amory Lovins, who is paid $20,000 a day to say that the dangerous fossil fuel company has the "environmental stamp of approval," tries to say that
only nuclear energy has a war potential, although there have been zero nuclear wars in the last 60 years.
The highly paid and corrupt anti-nuclear industry loves to distort things, and typical of such distortion is this representation of Crutezen's position.
In fact, the idea that Crutzen is a part of the moronic anti-nuclear industry is a bald faced distortion of the type one normally sees from the highly paid corrupt anti-nuclear industry of shit-for-brains pseudoenvironmentalists trolling for payoffs.
On Jan 23 of this year, Dr. Crutzen addressed the World Sustainable Development Forum.
http://www.teriin.org/dsds/2007/prog23.htmThe focus of the address by Prof. Paul Crutzen, Director Emeritus, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Germany, was on the scientific aspects of climate change and its history, the challenges we face today, and the possible solutions. The issue of climate change needs to be broadened from the main theme of carbon dioxide emissions, to consider other ozone-depleting gases such as methane, water vapour, and nitrous oxides. Heightened human activity has changed atmospheric chemistry and, as a result, global temperature is rising. We need to ask ourselves the question: ‘what can we do?’
There is an urgent need to stabilize the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by reducing emissions by 60%. Although methane emissions have stabilized in the past five years, nitrous oxide emission is still a matter of concern. Chlorofluorocarbon reduction has been achieved, but due to its long lifetime, it will continue to linger in the atmosphere for at least 70 years. Solutions are available in the form of striving for energy efficiency; carbon capture and storage; using nuclear power and renewable energy; and so on.
Italics and bold are mine.
The anti-nuclear industry is starting to look more and more like the rest of the highly paid religious fundamentalist movement. It has
nothing to do with science, and in fact, despises science and speaks of science only to distort it.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
