Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. George Voinovich says he will block mileage standards bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:53 AM
Original message
Sen. George Voinovich says he will block mileage standards bill
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 12:25 PM by Algorem
Sen. George Voinovich says at Lordstown that he will block mileage standards bill

http://www.cleveland.com/plaindealer/stories/index.ssf?/base/isope/1192005155234330.xml&coll=2&thispage=2

Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Sabrina Eaton Robert Schoenberger
Plain Dealer Reporters

Lordstown -- Saying it could cost thousands of automotive jobs in Ohio, Sen. George Voinovich pledged Tuesday to block debate on a bill that would increase federal fuel economy standards.

"It won't go to conference until we get some commitments over on the House side that they're not going to make this situation worse," the Ohio Republican said Tuesday during a news conference at a General Motors Corp. plant that manufactures Chevrolet Co balt and Pontiac G5 compact cars.

The Senate passed an energy bill in June that calls for auto producers to make fleets that get an average of 35 miles per gallon by 2020.
Advertisement

Toyota, General Motors, Ford and Chrysler have opposed the legislation, saying those standards would be prohibitively expensive to meet...





Voinovich pledges to fight fuel economy bill

http://blog.cleveland.com/business/2007/10/lordstown_saying_it_could.html

Posted by Sabrina Eaton and Robert Schoenberger October 09, 2007 16:21PM
Categories: Autos, Breaking News

Lordstown -- Saying it could cost thousands of automotive jobs in Sen. George Voinovich pledged Tuesday to block debate on a bill that would increase federal fuel economy standards.

"It won't go to conference until we get some commitments over on the House side that they're not going to make this situation worse," the Ohio Republican said Wednesday during a news conference at a General Motors plant that makes Chevrolet Cobalt and Pontiac G5 compact cars.

The Senate passed an energy bill in June that calls for auto producers to make fleets that get an average of 35 miles per gallon by 2020. Toyota, General Motors, Ford and Chrysler have opposed the legislation, saying those standards would be prohibitively expensive to meet.

Auto lobbying groups have said the Senate bill would cost jobs because it would force domestic producers to spend more on retooling plants and developing products. Meanwhile, importers, who are already much closer to meeting the standards, would be able to continue to sell without those huge expenses, allowing them to charge lower prices and take more market share from Ford, GM and Chrysler...


Voinovich won't back increased federal fuel economy standards

http://blog.cleveland.com/openers/

Posted by Sabrina Eaton and Robert Schoenberger October 09, 2007 17:50PM

Lordstown -- Saying it could cost thousands of automotive jobs in Ohio, Sen. George Voinovich pledged Tuesday to block debate on a bill that would increase federal fuel economy standards...


Post a comment View comments (0)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Voinovich = Neanderthal


So with global warming and peak oil he is still opposed to milage standards?

BTW G.M. is going close that plant when they get a chance too .... fuck the workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I was gonna say "dinosaur". But "neanderthal" works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. "We will continue to fight against anything that might make
American car manufacturers more competitive on the world market."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Does anybody even know what the theory is...
that supposedly explains why CAFE increases will reduce jobs? If somebody (god forbid) actually asked Voinovich "why will more aggressive mileage standards cost automotive jobs?" What would he say?

It's become some kind of Pavlovian response with these people. If there were any actual reasons for it, I wonder if any of them remember what they were. Quant Suff!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Oops, hey they actually provided an explaination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemunkee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. rewarding the short sighted companies that never retooled
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 05:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Pathetic really ...
... considering that the very same companies have had ample opportunity
to "re-tool" with each new model - i.e., as they are already changing
things for each new design, why on earth didn't they move FORWARD at the
same time instead of sticking resolutely to their 1950s approach?

Screw 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 05:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Maybe GM could hire Voinovich
Such an enormous tool should be quite handy on the shop floor. Made in the US, to boot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razzleberry Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. American cars traditionally had good engines
1950, 1960, 1970, eras.

the US car companies' niche was ...

an otherwise mediocre car with a good engine.

Take that away, and the US companies lose to
BMW and Mercedes-Benz on one end,

Kia and Chery, on the other



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC