Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Excessive suburban fees unwisely discourage solar investors

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 11:50 PM
Original message
Excessive suburban fees unwisely discourage solar investors
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/jan/05/excessive-suburban-fees-unwisely-discourage-solar-/

Excessive suburban fees unwisely discourage solar investors

By Michael Morton
Saturday, January 5, 2008

Denver suburbs penalize solar investors.

Residents investing in a typical 4-kilowatt solar system in cities around Denver must pay $600 to $1,500 for permit-related fees. Those costs are equal to from one to 2 1/2 years of the investor's energy savings. Denver residents, installing the same size system, pay a total of about $100, or less than 3 months worth of energy savings.

Permit-related fees include zoning and building department fees and a use tax. City department staffs are highly qualified and provide valuable services for which they must be paid. Use taxes are equally important in that these taxes are used to pay municipality infrastructure expenses. If a proposed project will increase the demand on a city's infrastructure, use taxes should apply.

Environmental, security and health-related costs are part of the infrastructure costs of city, state and federal governments and are paid for by taxes. Solar energy investments, by reducing the pollution and greenhouse gases that are associated with non-renewable fossil fuel-generated electricity, will lower city, state and federal infrastructure expenses.

In addition to lowering governmental operating costs, solar investments relieve the demand for cities and utilities to build expensive, taxpayer-subsidized fossil fuel power plants. Governmental operating expenses and subsidies are paid for with taxpayer dollars. Therefore, by lowering government operating expenses and reducing the need to build more power plants, solar investments will lead to fewer taxes that need to be collected. This should be a nonpartisan issue because everyone wants lower taxes.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. They should call the suburbs out on this by name
They should name the local government units that are charging excessive fees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC