Fusion scientist disagrees with fission (argues in favor of wind)

heard.. would be nice tho

He's a fusion scientist, arguing against fission.

Are you saying the anti-nuke fundie organization IEER has "fusion engineers" on its board?

Let's count the number of anti-nuke fundie organizations who know any math: Zero...zero...zero...zero...zero...

The amount of electricity produced by fusion energy is equivalent to the number of fundamentalist anti-nukes who can count: Zero...zero...zero...zero.

In fact, fusion is a toy, just as it has been for the last 50 years.

In fact, the number of dumb fundie anti-nukes - a fundie is a person who will not abandon dogma no matter how much science contradicts it - who understand that even if it worked - it doesn't - fusion would 1) Never be scalable and 2) depend entirely on a fission infrastructure.

I've covered this subject many times here, but fundie anti-nukes still come here all the time demonstrating that they have no clue where tritium comes from or where the world's largest supply of tritium is.

The world's largest supply of tritium is in Canada. It's a few tens of kilos. Now. You cannot be a fundie anti-nuke if you know any science - although many fundie anti-nukes come here with science fiction (which strangely enough has nothing to do with science). However it is easy to show by direct calculation that the world supply of tritium could run one power reactor - even if it ran at high efficiency - for a few months.

It is startling to recognize who anti-science and how illiterate fundamentalism really is.