Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Canada's most right-wing major newspaper gets Peak Oil

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:13 AM
Original message
Canada's most right-wing major newspaper gets Peak Oil
Finally!

OK, OK, so they don't use those two hateful words (because after all Peak Oil is a lefty conspiracy), but they do get it. This was published on the editorial pages of the National Post yesterday:

This oil squeeze may be permanent

Whether it is rising cost of the commute to work or operating a second car for the family, Canadians are justifiably stressed out by the sky-high price of oil. We are all nervously wondering if current prices are a once-in-a-generation spike, or if $1.20-per-litre gas will seem like a bargain a year from now.

There is a mounting body of evidence suggesting that global demand for oil is fast outstripping supply. For starters, global oil production has stagnated in recent years at approximately 87 million barrels per day. This is as much the result of the declining output by some of the world's largest oil fields (e.g., onetime oil exporters such as Mexico are now importing gas) as it is a reflection of the difficulty of finding new oil reserves: In the last 15 years, despite oil companies spending billions on exploration, only one new oil field with the potential to produce half a million barrels a day has been found.

The large untapped reserves that have been discovered in recent years -- such as last summer's big strike off the coast of Brazil -- must be extracted from thousands of metres below the sea floor or by refining hundreds of millions of tons of oil sands. All such new oil reserves can be exploited profitably only at current, and in many cases higher, per-barrel prices.

Griffiths even understands the net oil export crisis (aka Jeffrey Brown's Export Land Model):

Compounding the global supply problem is the petro-nationalism of the major oil-producing nations such as Iran, Venezuela, Russia and Indonesia. These and other governments of big oil exporters are subsidizing the cost of petroleum for their citizens and domestic industries to strengthen their hold on power. As the populations of these countries continue to grow, so will their domestic energy demand. The result: Less and less oil will end up on world markets.

Well, well, well. Oil wells that ends well, I guess...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pbca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. The sad thing is
Most drivers are still in denial. It is not going to change, gas prices aren't coming down ever - ethanol/biofuel is not really a solution and in light of the world food crisis should be banned. Cutting gas taxes isn't a solution: it might reduce prices by a few cents for a few days - at a cost of billions to government, but within a few weekes you wouldn't be able to tell that anything had been done.

It should also be said that people don't even have a real right to be angry. Anyone who was paying attention has known this was coming for 30 years now and no one did anything, because it wasn't something voters were interested in.

The reality is people have to stop commuting, get on busses and trains and get ready to give up their cars (unless they are very rich). People can rail against this all they like, they can remain in denial but it isn't going to change a thing - and any politician who tells you differently is lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's pretty much it. There are a lot of politicians who also get it, I'm discovering.
They just can't say anything about it in public, or they'll get creamed by their opponents who are willing to sell the voters pie in the sky to get elected. They'll tell you in private that they have Matt Simmons' Powerpoints on their laptops, but they can't breathe a word about it in public. Instead, they get involved in wind/solar/mass transit projects to try and accomplish something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. spanish prisoner dilemma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC