Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

High Fuel Costs Could Reduce Tuna Fishing: Industry Group

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:55 PM
Original message
High Fuel Costs Could Reduce Tuna Fishing: Industry Group
<<Rising fuel costs may force one third of ocean-going long-line tuna fishing boats across the world to halt operations, an industry group said Thursday.

About 140 boats from Taiwan, China, South Korea, Fiji and elsewhere are already standing idle at port, said Yuichiro Harada, managing director at the Tokyo-based Organisation for the Promotion of Responsible Tuna Fisheries.

"Another 260 boats are considering suspending operations, bringing the total number to about 400" out of 1,174 boats operated by members of the organisation, Harada told AFP.

"The more you operate, the more money you lose" due to high fuel costs, he said, adding that a typical Japanese boat would lose 100,000 yen (970 dollars) in one day of long-line open-ocean fishing.

<snip>

>>

http://rawstory.com/news/afp/High_fuel_costs_could_reduce_tuna_f_05292008.html

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Would it be too much to hope that this allegation is true? The world's tuna fish populations have been decimated by all-too-efficient tuna fishing vessels driving tuna populations to the brink of economic and biological extinction. While "no-take" zones and tough enforcement of tuna quotas would greatly improve the world's tuna population's chances for survival, LESS fishing, not more, would improve these creatures' chances for propogating into future generations and allowing our descendants to enjoy tuna in the sea and at least occasionally tuna on their platters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, it wouldn't hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doug.Goodall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. I bet the dolphins are loving that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. The tuna aren't complaining either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-30-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Not to mention sea turtles
Long-liner tuna boats are also all too effective at catching sea turtles. While I believe that the World Wildlife Federation has developed a fish hook that is much less likely to catch sea turtles instead of tuna, sea turtles still get entangled in long lines, and I doubt that the new, improved fish hooks are all that widespread on the tuna boats still going to sea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good.
Not so good for the fishermen out of work, but maybe we could pay them to do something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. You paying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. Already hurting shrimping and sportfishing here.
Shrimp boats and charter boats stay moored at the docks.
The ones who do go out have to charge a lot more to cover fuel.

A few months ago we paid $4 lb. for large shrimp directly from the boat.
Last week $6.

We were in Sam's a short time ago. They had frozen shrimp for $2.99 a pound. Small ones. What we call 'gumbo shrimp'.
5 lb. bags.
One pile was from China.
The other from Viet Nam.
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC