House Ag Cmte Chair Will Oppose Climate Bill - Angry At Provisions Of 2007 Energy Bill He Voted For

:eyes:

WASHINGTON - May 6 - The chairman of the House Agriculture Committee reportedly declared at a hearing today that he “will not support any kind of climate change bill” because he is “upset” that proposed EPA biofuels rules require all global warming pollution resulting from biofuels production to be taken into account.
In particular, Representative Collin Peterson (D-MN) is angry that when calculating the amount of global warming pollution caused by biofuels production, the EPA will take pollution caused by land use changes into account. Demand for land on which to grow crops for biofuels can lead to deforestation and destruction of grasslands and wetlands, resulting in substantial pollution. Because of this, the 2007 energy bill, which Peterson voted for and was enacted into law, requires the EPA to account for all land use impacts of biofuels.

“It’s pretty stunning that less than two years ago, Peterson voted for the law requiring the EPA to account for this pollution, but he apparently now wants the EPA to break the law he voted for,” said Kate McMahon of Friends of the Earth. “The EPA indicated yesterday that it plans to follow that law instead of doing Peterson’s bidding, so now he throws a temper tantrum. It’s embarrassing.”

“But there is also something profoundly serious here,” said McMahon. “Climate destabilization threatens the livelihoods of the very farmers about whom Peterson purports to be concerned. According to a study by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Carnegie Institution, climate changes are already costing corn producers $1.2 billion per year worldwide, and according to a new Environment America report, the climate crisis is projected to cause $135 million a year in damages to corn production in Peterson’s home state of Minnesota. That’s just one of the parts of Minnesota’s economy that will suffer. It’s appalling that Peterson is so cavalier about these impacts that he’d threaten to oppose any solution to the climate crisis just because he and some of his corporate agribusiness buddies are angry about biofuels regulations. It shows how out of touch Peterson is with the gravity of the threat climate change poses.”

EDIT

http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2009/05/06-18

Greedy little buggers...