Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Environmentalist Burned to Death By Ethanol.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 10:26 PM
Original message
Environmentalist Burned to Death By Ethanol.
Edited on Tue Apr-06-10 10:27 PM by NNadir
A Brazilian environmentalist has died after self-immolation in a protest against the construction of alcohol factories in the Pantanal marsh region. The 65-year-old Francisco Anselmo de Barros wrapped himself in an alcohol-soaked blanket and set it on fire during a protest Saturday in Campo Grande, 1,200 kilometers (750 miles) northwest of Rio de Janeiro.


Barros was president of the Foundation for Nature Conservation in Mato Grosso do Sul state, a group he founded in 1980. He was vehemently opposed to the sugar cane factories in the Pantanal, a vast wetland area covering portions of Brazil, Paraguay, and Bolivia that is renowned for its biological diversity -- especially its wildlife. After the Amazon rainforest, the Pantanal is one of the best known destinations for nature travelers and ecotourists in Brazil.


http://news.mongabay.com/2005/1114-globo.html ">Brazliian environmentalist dies after self-immolation protest


I have written about this case before, of course, because I actually learned what the Pantanal is from this very odd case.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/12/16/105448/03">Those Happy Sugarcane Workers In Brazil: The Car Culture and Urinary Carcinogens.

I wrote about it in 2007, and the same fucking clueless people, about 75 billion tons of dangerous fossil fuel waste dumping later are still giggling oblivious about their precious twirp cars and their precious twirp delusions about how ripping up every living thing on earth is worthwhile, so long as they can keep their cars.

In fact, the people in the car CULTs care more about their Rice Krispies than they care about the horrible frustration that lead to the despair of Francisco Anselmo de Barros and his fight against their worthless little crusade to save their suburban garages.

Worthless consumers, uneducated, oblivious, indifferent, and prone to very, very, very, very, very, very toxic selective attention.

I have always hated the car CULTure myself, of course, and have zero respect for its apologists, including the ones who celebrate the destruction of the rain forests of the Amazon, the Pantanal, Sumatra with giggly expressions of glee and self delusion over the dumb idea that their cars can be saved, no matter what the cost, by grinding up and destroying ever larger amounts of natural habitat.

Their cars cannot be saved and people are dying right now because they have demanded that only the best form of primary energy on earth be perfect while all the horseshit they ferment, and dangerous fossil fuels they greenwash, can kill at will.

Have a nice oblivious evening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Biofuels, including ethanol, have a significant role to play in a noncarbon energy system
It is difficult to do without the energy density of liquid fuels so even after we electrify the personal transport sector there are a wide range of applications that we will need to depend on biofuels to meet.

Nuclear, not so much. "Using nuclear fission to boil water is like using a chainsaw to cut butter."

Have you seen this:
The reactor core at the Davis-Besse nuclear plant sits within a metal pot designed to withstand pressures up to 2,500 pounds per square inch. The pot -- called the reactor vessel -- has carbon steel walls nearly six inches thick to provide the necessary strength. Because the water cooling the reactor contains boric acid that is highly corrosive to carbon steel, the entire inner surface of the reactor vessel is covered with 3/16-inch thick stainless steel.

But water routinely leaked onto the reactor vessel's outer surface. Because the outer surface lacked a protective stainless steel coating, boric acid ate its way through the carbon steel wall until it reached the backside of the inner liner. High pressure inside the reactor vessel pushed the stainless steel outward into the cavity formed by the boric acid. The stainless steel bent but did not break. Cooling water remained inside the reactor vessel not because of thick carbon steel but due to a thin layer of stainless steel. The plant's owner ignored numerous warning signs spanning many years to create the reactor with a hole in its head.

Workers repairing one of five cracked control rod drive mechanism (CRDM) nozzles at Davis-Besse discovered extensive damage to the reactor vessel head. The reactor vessel head is the dome-shaped upper portion of the carbon steel vessel housing the reactor core. It can be removed when the plant is shut down to allow spent nuclear fuel to be replaced with fresh fuel. The CRDM nozzles connect motors mounted on a platform above the reactor vessel head to control rods within the reactor vessel. Operators withdraw control rods from the reactor core to startup the plant and insert them to shut down the reactor.

The workers found a large hole in the reactor vessel head next to CRDM nozzle #3. The hole was about six inches deep, five inches long, and seven inches wide. The hole extended to within 1-1/2 inches of the adjacent CRDM nozzle #11. The stainless steel liner welded to the inner surface of the reactor vessel head for protection against boric acid was at the bottom of the hole. This liner was approximately 3/16-inch thick and had bulged outward about 1/8-inch due to the high pressure (over one ton per square inch) inside the reactor vessel.

What could have happened?

A loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) occurs if the stainless steel liner fails or CRDM nozzle #3 is ejected. The water cooling the reactor core quickly empties through the hole into the containment building. The containment building is made of reinforced concrete designed to withstand the pressure surge from the flow through the break.

To compensate for the reactor water exiting through the hole, water inside the pressurizer (PZR) and the cold leg accumulators flows into the reactor vessel. This initial makeup is supplemented by water from the Refueling Water Storage Tank (RWST) delivered to the reactor vessel by the high, intermediate, and low pressure injection pumps. The makeup water re-fills the reactor vessel and overflows out the hole in the reactor vessel head. Approximately 30 to 45 minutes later, the RWST empties. Operators close valves between the pumps and the RWST and open valves between the low pressure injection (RHR) pumps and the containment sump. Water pouring from the broken reactor vessel head drains to the containment sump where the RHR pumps recycle it to the reactor vessel. A cooling water system supplies water to the RHR heat exchanger shown to the left of the RHR pump to remove heat generated by the reactor core.
On paper, that's how the safety systems would have functioned to protect the public. But the following examples suggest that things might not have gone by the book:

-The Three Mile Island nuclear plant experienced a loss of coolant accident in March 1979. Emergency
pumps automatically started to replace the water flowing out the leak. Operators turned off the pumps
because instruments falsely indicated too much water in the reactor vessel. Within two hours, the reactor
core overheated and melted, triggering the evacuation of nearly 150,000 people.

-At the Callaway nuclear plant in 2001, workers encountered problems while testing one of the emergency
pumps. Investigation revealed that a foam-like bladder inside the RWST was flaking apart. Water carried
chunks of debris to the pump where it blocked flow. The debris would have disabled all the emergency
pumps during an accident.

-At the Haddam Neck nuclear plant in 1996, the NRC discovered the piping carrying water from the RWST
to the reactor vessel was too small. It was long enough but it was not wide enough to carry enough water
during an accident to re-fill the reactor vessel in time to prevent meltdown. The plant operated for nearly 30
years with this undetected vulnerability.

-At several US and foreign nuclear power plants, including the Limerick nuclear plant 8 years ago, the force
of water/steam entering the containment building during a loss of coolant accident has blown insulation off
piping and equipment. The water carried that insulation and other debris into the containment sump. The
debris clogged the piping going to the emergency pumps much like hair clogs a bathtub drain. According to
a recent government report, 46 percent of US nuclear plants are very likely to experience blockage in the
containment sumps in event of a hole the size found at Davis-Besse opens up. For slightly larger holes, the
chances of failure increase to 82 percent.<1>

Thus, events at Davis-Besse may have gone by the book had the stainless steel failed it would have become the subject of many books on the worst loss of coolant accident in US history...
UCS -- Aging Nuclear Plants -- Davis-Besse: The Reactor with a Hole in its Head
http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/nuclear_power/acfnx8tzc.pdf







Scapegoating of Davis Besse by NRC
http://www.ucsusa.org/news/press_release/federal-agency-scapegoating-0141.html

Retrospective
http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_power/nuclear_power_risk/safety/davis-besse-retrospective.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you for the reminder
I agree that folks have a tendency to look no further than our borders when it comes to environmentalism. They'll buy an acre of rain forest, and then burn ten acres in biofuel or "renewable" woods and not even know they're doing it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fledermaus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. The article date, November 14, 2005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC