Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Intelligent networking of wind farms

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-10 06:15 PM
Original message
Intelligent networking of wind farms
http://www.fraunhofer.de/en/press/research-news/2010/04/networking-wind-farms.jsp

Intelligent networking of wind farms

Research News April 2010

The EU member states have passed a resolution requiring one fifth of their electricity needs to be derived from renewable energy sources by 2020, with wind farms covering a large part of this requirement. Researchers have succeeded in interconnecting large wind farms in clusters.

The future belongs to renewable energies. Wind energy is one of the main forms of renewable energy experiencing a boom. According to the German Wind Energy Association, 952 new facilities were installed in Germany in 2009. The German Renewable Energy Federation predicts that 47 percent of total electricity consumption in 2020, estima-ted at 595 terawatt hours, will be covered by renewable energy sources, with wind energy accounting for one quarter.

»Wind on the Grid«, one of the EU's biggest network integration projects, has just been completed. A group of European industrial companies and research organizations teamed up to investigate how wind farms on the Iberian peninsula could be safely integrated in the European electricity grid on a large scale. To assist grid operators in the capture, control and forecasting of wind energy, the Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy and Energy System Technology IWES has made available both its Wind Farm Cluster Management System (WCMS) and its Wind Power Management System, adding new functions to both. The researchers used these software packages to integrate five wind farms in Portugal with a total capacity of 204 megawatts and six in Spain with a total capacity of 107 megawatts in the power grid. The integration was achieved in real-time tests under a variety of weather conditions. »We used the WCMS to link the scattered wind farms in a cluster, enabling them to be controlled by the central control station of the Portuguese and Spanish power utilities respectively. While the WCMS keeps both the frequency and the voltage of the electricity grid constant, thus ensuring safe operation, Fraunhofer's Wind Power Management System forecasting software uses artificial neural networks to calculate expected wind energy on the basis of predicted weather patterns,« explains Dr. Kurt Rohrig, department head at the Kassel branch of the IWES. Individual wind farms are subject to wide fluctuations in output The more wind farms that can be interconnected in a cluster, the easier it is to balance out the fluctuations caused by variations in wind force, from gusty winds to totally calm conditions. And the higher the number of installed facilities, the lower the energy price. »The price of electricity produced using wind energy is currently seven cents per kilowatt-hour; by 2025 it should be around four cents,« says Rohrig.

Fraunhofer researchers are negotiating with the Portuguese grid operator with the aim of integrating their software in the latter's control system. And Kurt Rohrig is convinced: »In the long term, wind farms will replace traditional power plants.«

* http://www.fraunhofer.de/en/Images/rn4_FERTIG_tcm63-48552.pdf">Research News April 2010 ( PDF 511KB )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-10 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for posting this.
While watching the Planet channel the other night, I was happy to learn that some people are living off the grid by buying a "Sprite" which can be put up next to your house and that handles 450 Watts of power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You're welcome
There are a number of personal sized wind turbines.

I know people who live off-the-grid using a combination of solar panels and a wind turbine.

However, when it comes to wind turbines, larger generally means more cost efficient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-10 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe they could integrate some of those massive German coal plants
to help prevent some of the cycling waste when the wind isn't blowing? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I didn't realize Germany was on the Iberian peninsula!
I guess you learn something new every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I didn't realize that was their only market!
We both learn...from each other! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-10 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Similar to this one from the MidAtlantic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yup, the concept (as you known) is really nothing new
The major difference is that this one is implemented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-22-10 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. That *is* very significant.
I wanted to preempt the inevitable Republican talking point that "America is different".

This was also interesting, "And the higher the number of installed facilities, the lower the energy price. The price of electricity produced using wind energy is currently seven cents per kilowatt-hour; by 2025 it should be around four cents,« says Rohrig."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes, the price lowering isn't really new (in concept) either
Back-filling for a fluctuation power supply costs money, and in the end, it is the consume who will pay for it.

If the power supply is stabilized, then it becomes less expensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Events are bearing that out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kick and recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
12. Bad news for the antirenewablenuts who claim renewbles can NEVER be a significant energy source
yup!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. here is a prediction by Citigroup that explains why they attack renewable energy
Edited on Mon Apr-26-10 06:43 AM by kristopher
This analysis of validity of new nuclear generation in Europe as an investment vehicle really should be read very, very closely.

The large lead times and the volatility in commodity prices though means that power prices are not necessarily at the “right” level when construction or even operation starts. As nuclear plants will by default be price takers and their life duration far exceeds any measure of economic, commodity, electoral or infrastructure cycle, it is very difficult to envisage a scenario where the economic rational of new nuclear is unquestionable without subsidies/locked in return. Indeed, Figure 3 below shows that no such 40-year period (minimum nuclear asset life) exists since the 1900s.



As a result, we argue that political will and political perception of economic variables rather than actual economic factors is the single most important driver for new nuclear construction and that in itself should be a concern for equity investors.



What the market should not take for granted


GDP impact on demand and load factors

Consensus view is that electricity demand in the wide European region will grow by 1.5% p.a. over the next couple of decades. This is a view shared by UCTE in its latest System Adequacy Report. Although it is virtually impossible to produce irrefutable electricity demand forecast we are tempted to argue that the risks are on the downside since:

1. During the boom years of 2003-07, when GDP growth was strong and infrastructure investment high on the back of very liquid debt markets and due to the convergence of the new EU joiners, electricity consumption grew by 2.1% p.a.

2. Energy efficiency is likely to become a bigger driver as technology advances and as awareness rises. It is important to highlight that such measures also fall under the Climate Change agenda of governments, which has been one of the driving forces behind the renaissance of new nuclear.

As a result, we would expect electricity demand growth to be in the 0-1% range for at least the next 5 years, before returning to more normal pace of 1.5-2%. We therefore see scope for an extra 346TWh of electricity that needs to be covered by 2020 vs. 2008 levels.

Should EU countries go half way towards meeting their renewables target of 20% by 2020 that would be an extra ca. 440TWh. Even if EU went only half way, which by all means is a very conservative estimate, that would still be ca.220TWh of additional generation. Under its conservative ‘scenario A’ forecast, UCTE expects 28GW of net new fossil fuel capacity to be constructed by 2020. On an average load factor of 45% for those plants that’s an extra 110TWh. Therefore under very conservative assumptions on renewables, we can reliably expect an extra 330TWh of electricity to be generated by 2020, leaving a shortfall of 16TWh to be made up by either energy efficiency or new nuclear.

There are currently 10GW of nuclear capacity under construction/development, including the UK proposed plants that should be on operation by 2020. If we assume that energy efficiency will not contribute, that would imply a load factor for the plants of 18%. Looking at the entire available nuclear fleet that would imply a load factor of just 76%. We do believe though that steps towards energy efficiency will also be taken, thus the impact on load factors could be larger.

Under a scenario of the renewables target being fully delivered then the load factor for nuclear would fall to 56%.

Such a reduction is actually already underway, with load factors for nuclear plants in Europe falling from 85% on average during the beginning of the decade to below 80% as renewables increase their share in the fuel mix. In our opinion a slow down or fall in demand could have an even bigger effect, substantially affecting the economics of new plants.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I think this is that citigroup report
Edited on Thu Apr-29-10 01:23 AM by bananas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC