Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Private sleuths once pierced nuclear veil

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 07:12 PM
Original message
Private sleuths once pierced nuclear veil
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hoWtJ-2e3020LrlJQFuJYSvmVLLAD9FGT0EO0

Private sleuths once pierced nuclear veil
By ROBERT BURNS (AP) – 3 hours ago

WASHINGTON — Shortly after nuclear weapons sleuths Tom Cochran and Bill Arkin published their unauthorized estimate of the size of the U.S. arsenal in 1984 they got a call from alarmed U.S. officials.

"They called us over and wanted to know where we got the numbers," Cochran recalls from a time when almost everything about history's deadliest weapon — including how many the U.S. possessed — was classified secret. It was a culture of secrecy born during the Cold War, out of a belief that nuclear candor could be dangerous.

America's official nuclear silence ended Monday when the Obama administration not only disclosed the number of U.S. nuclear weapons available for use in wartime — 5,113 as of last Sept. 30 — but surprised many by also publishing weapons totals for each year dating to 1962. (Pre-1962 data was released in 1993.)

<snip>

The U.S. disclosure didn't just strike a blow for transparency in the global debate over nuclear weapons. It revealed the remarkable accuracy of the effort by Cochran, Arkin and others, who labored for 30 years to pull back the veil that surrounded these weapons.

"We were pretty close all along — sometimes right on the button," said Robert S. Norris, another of the nuclear number detectives.

Their most recent estimate was 5,100, or just 13 weapons fewer than the number the government published Monday.

<snip>

Secrecy aside, Cochran and Arkin produced in 1984 the first volume of their encyclopedic "Nuclear Weapons Databook," compiled from mining a mountain of responses to Freedom of Information Act requests and from years of scouring congressional hearing transcripts, unclassified government reports, budgets and other open records.

It was, in the view of McGeorge Bundy, who served as national security adviser to President John F. Kennedy, a historic victory for "private clarification" over "government obfuscation." Bundy praised the 340-page work in a New York Times Book Review article in March 1984.

<snip>

"They couldn't believe we had the numbers. They thought there was a leak in the system," Cochran said. He and Norris work for the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group.

<snip>

Hans Kristensen, who worked with Cochran and Norris, said he and his cohorts sometimes heard useful "whispers" from certain officials, but for the most part they relied on simple number crunching and a nose for nuance.

<snip>


Anti-nuke environmentalists proven right again!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. What about the 30,000+ of U.S.pieces of missing nuclear material?
Not talking about weapons.

Nukes are an extremely foolish, shortsighted "option."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC