Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Administration Supports Lifting Liability Cap For "Future" Oil Spills - NYT/Greenwire

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:29 PM
Original message
Obama Administration Supports Lifting Liability Cap For "Future" Oil Spills - NYT/Greenwire
The Obama administration maintains there should be no limit on oil companies' spill liability, but a top Justice Department official said it is not proposing to change the $75 million limit on BP PLC's Gulf of Mexico spill because the company has pledged to pay all legitimate claims.

"We are focused on the future," Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli, the department's No. 3 official, told the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on the BP spill's 36th day. Still, Perrelli said, Congress would be on solid constitutional ground if it wanted to raise the liability caps retroactively on BP for economic damages. "Congress legislates retroactively all the time," he said.

Perrelli said the administration is determined to make sure BP lives up to its commitment to pay for the damage it has caused. In the future, he said, the cap should be eliminated. "We don't think there should be an arbitrary cap on financial liability," Perrelli said.

The nuanced position drew strong criticism from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). "You may be one of the few people in the country who takes BP at its word," Sanders said. "A year from now, the television cameras will be gone, and it will be a fisherman who's trying to file a claim. And he's going to be by himself."

EDIT

http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2010/05/25/25greenwire-obama-administration-supports-lifting-liability-2382.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. win-win -- BP gets away with ecological disaster, WH gets to keep a big contributor
And the WH gets to *say* they are *protecting the environment* when they have their hands out for more donations and votes in 2012.

*Perception* is the only thing this administration gets right. Toothless media darlings get to have their cake and eat it too....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Your hyperbole is sexy.
Edited on Wed May-26-10 12:45 PM by jefferson_dem
That being said and the current disaster notwithstanding...

Do you really think lifting the liability cap for *future* spills would not serve to "protect the environment" and doing so only amounts to industry coddling by the Administration, which will benefit them in 2012?

I'm curious if you think the only thing Obama has gotten right is "perception" regarding this oil spill or overall. If the latter is the case, then there's literally nothing separating that point of view from one held by the most rabid, hardcore teabagger around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Wish I could recommend your post! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. good thing the senate raises the cap, not some guy at Justice Dept.
Edited on Wed May-26-10 12:35 PM by dionysus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nykym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. but a top Justice Department official said
it is not proposing to change the $75 million limit on BP PLC's Gulf of Mexico spill because the company has pledged to pay all legitimate claims. OK show me the signed document that states that! Or is it going to be OH! MY BAD - I misspoke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC