Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fukushima: Radiation on 2nd Floor of Reactor 1 Exceeded 1,000 Millisieverts/Hour

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 05:06 PM
Original message
Fukushima: Radiation on 2nd Floor of Reactor 1 Exceeded 1,000 Millisieverts/Hour
Or more than 1 sievert/hour.

When 7 TEPCO employees and 2 NISA employees entered the Reactor 1 reactor building on early hours of May 9 (JST), the act that released mere 500 million becquerels of radioactive iodine and cesium into the atmosphere, they measured the radiation level on the ground floor which was 600 to 700 millisieverts/hour at the highest spot.

Then on May 10, someone went upstairs to the 2nd floor for the first time since March 11, and measured the radiation there. It was so high that the Geiger counter couldn't accurately measure. ...

#Fukushima I Nuke Plant: Radiation on 2nd Floor of Reactor 1 Exceeded 1,000 Millisieverts/Hour
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Early on, and I am not prone to do that, but if you pray
this is one of those occasions.

Otherwise, we watch... with horror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. This week has been really bad, not sure I'm ready for what is to come next week!
It just seems inevitable that the area will become uninhabitable and they'll just let it go.

Any one of the reactors could spew at a greater rate or No. 4's sfp could topple, yikes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Exclusion zone was a given from early on
the question... Alex exclusion zone for 1000, ah daily double...

This zone is (insert km here) large ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. But what is it we're going to watch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The worst man made disaster of the early 21st century
and the one our media is truly ignoring
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. If lightning strikes your home and burns it to the ground...
...is it a "man-made disaster"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
CJvR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Ignoring it?
They hardly even noticed the Tsunami that killed thousands but instead we got endless reports on Fukushima. However it is now months since the worst of the crisis passed so it is hardly strange that Fukushims isn't in the headlines anymore, particulary as things don't seem to get much worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Amazing, isn't it?
There's just NOTHING on CNN, or on other cable news outlets. I've seen nothing on
quick looks at online MSM sources either.

BASTARDS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. CBS news has a story telling us that everything is ok and on track to build more reactors...
Does that count?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. It does count...
It counts as one more asanine act from our friends in corporomedialand; otherwise known as shillsville.

BASTARDS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. 1000 millisieverts an hour is not "off the scale."
It's about the level at which you might get some mild symptoms of radiation poisoning (days later, that is) if you stayed there without a protective suit for a couple hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. And more than likely you'll ultimately die from cancer
And not that far down the road either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Do you know what "off the scale" means? It means higher than the device can measure.
The geiger counter used only goes up to 1000 millisieverts an hour,
and the actual radiation level was higher than that.
So the radiation was literally "off the scale" of the device measuring it.
We don't know what the actual level was, all we know is it was more than 1000 millisieverts an hour.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Throckmorton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Protective suit?
A magic Gamma Proof Suit no doubt.

PCs keep loose contamination off you and out of you, that is it.

Maybe a lead lined suit, that weights a few hundred pounds would be helpful.

1 Sievert/Hour dose rate is considered by every Health Physics professional I have asked, as the lower limit for Acute Radiation Effects (that will have an onset within 4 weeks).

Areas with 1 Sievert per hours dose rates are those with those big locked doors and the Grave Danger postings.

"General radiation doses to the entire body and expected effects:
100-200 rem received in a short time will cause nausea and fatigue.
100-200 rem received over a long period will increase a person’s chances of getting cancer.
200-300 rem received in a short time will cause nausea and vomiting within 24-48 hours. Medical attention should be sought.
300-500 rem received in a short time will cause nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea within hours. Loss of hair and appetite occurs within a week. Medical attention must be sought for survival; half of the people exposed to radiation at this high level will die if they receive no medical attention.
500-1,200 rem in a short time will likely lead to death within a few days.
Greater than 10,000 rem in a short time will lead to death within a few hours."

From the Health Physic Society, WWW.HPS.ORG, Radiation Effects Presentation



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-11 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
15. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC