Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Santee Cooper announces plans to build a new nuclear plant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 10:09 PM
Original message
Santee Cooper announces plans to build a new nuclear plant
Here is yet another planned reactor in the US to go with the 2 planned by NuStart, the 2 planned by Constellation, the 2 planed by Duke and the two planned by Progress Energy. (Note that it was reported in this week's Wall Street Journal that Constellation will be purchased by Florida Power and Light, a company with considerable nuclear assets.

LCG, December 16, 2005--SCANA Corporation and Santee Cooper filed a letter of intent with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to seek a permit to build a nuclear reactor...

...The letter of intent adds momentum to the efforts to develop and build new nuclear reactors in the Southeast. Over 15,000 MW are proposed to commence operations starting in the 2015 to 2017 time-frame. Companies actively pursuing the development of new reactors in the Southeast include: Progress Energy, which plans to seek licenses to build up to four nuclear reactors at two locations; Duke Power, which announced that it is preparing a combined construction and operating license (COL) application to construct two nuclear reactors; and Southern Nuclear Operating Company, which has selected its Vogtle Nuclear Station in Georgia for consideration as a site for new nuclear reactors.

In September, the NuStart Energy Development, LLC, a consortium founded in 2004 to support the development of new nuclear power, announced that its two finalist sites for the development of new nuclear reactors are Grand Gulf Nuclear Station (owned by Entergy Nuclear) in Port Gibson, Mississippi and Bellefonte Nuclear Plant (owned by the Tennessee Valley Authority) near Scottsboro, Alabama.

http://www.energyonline.com/news/articles/Articlefor121605.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. 15,000 MW, thats a lot of power.
But most of these aren't supposed to come online until 2015 to 2017. How many of the older current reactors do you think are going to get decommissioned in that time frame?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. These new reactors will represent 1.5% of the total energy demand
Edited on Mon Dec-19-05 09:31 AM by NNadir
of the United States assuming it remains around 100 exajoules (total including thermal losses), and the reactors run, as is typical of modern reactors, at 90% capacity loading.

It is not clear how many reactors will be decommissioned in that period. Many reactors have had license extensions. Here in New Jersey, the Oyster Creek reactor's license expires in 2009. However most people, including our newly elected Governor, John Corzine, would like to keep the reactor operating through a license extension. The extension process, however, is not completed.

Some reactors will undoubtedly be decommissioned. How many, I don't know. Most reactors that have been decommissioned thus far have been small, ten of them are less than 1000 MWth. In the United States since the dawn of the nuclear era, 19 reactors have been built, operated and are being decommissioned. Four reactors have more or less completed this process and a 5th, Yankee Rowe, is 80% dismantled. (The decommissioning of Yankee Rowe was the subject of a Scientific American article some time ago that I thought was quite good.)

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/decommissioning.html

There has been some talk - I don't know how serious it is, not very serious I think - of upgrading the steam generators at Zion 1 and 2 in Chicago and reopening those reactors. The reactors were shut in 1998 because a $450 million upgrade to the steam generators was required. It was not believed at the time - when natural gas was less than 1/3 of its present cost - that the upgrade would be economic. The plant's licenses ran only to 2013. (The reactor also had poor operational performance - everyone in Chicago will die. These reactors are trotted out by the usual anti-environmental anti-nuclear crowd as evidence that the nuclear industry is failing and is going to whither away.)

The precedent for reopening formerly closed reactors is being set by Brown's Ferry-1, which is currently being rebuilt since closing in 1985. This reactor was the site of the most serious nuclear accident before Three Mile Island, at the dawn of the nuclear age, in 1975. There was a fire in a non-nuclear portion of the reactor started by a candle, of all things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC