Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cape Wind will proceed!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
midnight armadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:42 AM
Original message
Cape Wind will proceed!
From the Union of Concerned Scientists email I received:

In March, a last-minute, special
interest provision was added to the Coast Guard bill that would have
given the Governor of Massachusetts-an outspoken opponent of Cape
Wind-the arbitrary authority to veto it.

Thankfully, new language has now been accepted to this bill that will
allow Cape Wind to proceed while the Coast Guard retains the
authority to ensure that the turbines pose no threat to navigation.


Ted Kennedy was the one who made the change, so Gov Mitt "Good hair & teeth is all I need to be President" Romney won't have veto power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good, Kennedy has put in a good compromise
because shipping lanes and even small boat passage have to be protected.

The generators will be atop shoals, as I understand it, so they'd be a very convenient marker for both. There is nothing more hideous than the sound of a keel scraping something you didn't know was there because the chart was incomplete. Been there, done that.

If I still lived there, I wouldn't mind looking at them. Pictures of what the project will look like are at http://www.capewind.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&file=index&req=viewarticle&artid=9&page=1
The Craigville picture is the one closest to what Kennedy will see from his summer home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I assume they are lighted at night? that would be the only drawback
I can see. living with an amateur astronomer, I have gotten very sensitive to night time light pollution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Have you ever been to Cape Cod?
Light pollution is the least of an amateur astronomer's worries. Three seasons of the year, there's generally a huge fog bank just offshore. It comes rolling on in most nights, rendering telescopes useless for both stargazing and looking for boats coming in. During the winter, it's quite a bit clearer, but it's bitter and not terribly conducive to being out with a telescope. It's been done in the late 1800s from Nantucket, but Cape Cod isn't one of your prime areas for stargazing.

The light pollution is probably going to consist of red aircaft lights on the tops of the poles, not terribly bright but enough to ward off small, low flying aircraft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-01-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. a million years ago as a child and red lights are no prob for night
adapted eyes

good point about the weather too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I bet Ted's taken a lot of flack for his previous opposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight armadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That must be the case
The UCS stated they generated 48,000 phone calls, emails, and mailings on this issue, presumably many of them heading Kennedy's way.

With the proposed BUzzard's Bay wind project Cape Cod, Nantucket, and Martha's Vineyard could essentially generate all their energy use via wind.

That said, the B's Bay project is much trickier compared to Cape Wind due to siting issues and ship traffic. Of course, since that project is located next to the fairly poor communities of New Bedford, Fall River, etc, Mitt Romney and other politicians are all for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Mitt the Shitt, slapped by TED, and GOOD for TED!!!! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-30-06 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. As I understand it, this compromise means...
only that the gov won't have veto power. It still has to be approved by the legislature (and coast guard). Definitely a victory of sorts, but the project itself is not yet approved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC