Prairie Grasses Emerge As Rich Energy Source

http://www1.umn.edu/umnnews/Feature_Stories/Back_to_the_future_prairie_grasses.html

Mixtures of grasses make best source of biofuel

A study led by Regents Professor of Ecology David Tilman shows how the diverse mixtures of prairie grasses that greeted the pioneers are an untapped source of renewable, greenhouse gas-lowering energy.

By Deane Morrison

Dec. 8, 2006

With shrinking glaciers and other signs of global warming upon us, the search is on for alternative fuels to stem the release of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. This week a new contender burst on the scene: diverse mixtures of native prairie grasses. A University team led by David Tilman, Regents Professor of Ecology, found that these grasses yield more net energy than either ethanol from corn or "biodiesel" fuel from soybeans. Grass-based fuel can even lead to a net decrease in atmospheric carbon dioxide, whereas ethanol and biodiesel increase it.

The study is based on 10 years of work at the University's Cedar Creek Natural History Area. Written by Tilman, postdoctoral researcher Jason Hill and research associate Clarence Lehman, it is the cover story in the Dec. 8 issue of the journal Science. For many years, renewable fuels from plants ("biofuels") have been seen as beacons of hope because the carbon dioxide released in burning them can be absorbed by the next year's crop. But in a report earlier this year, Tilman, Hill and others showed that corn grain ethanol and soy biodiesel do little to offset carbon dioxide emissions because it takes so much fossil fuel to produce them.

The new work demonstrates that it's not monoculture crops like corn, soybeans or even switchgrass, but rather the "sea of grass" that fell to the plow in the 19th century that harbors a bright hope for the 21st. Mixtures of native perennial grasses and other flowering plants require little energy or fertilizer to turn into fuel, yield up to 238 percent more usable energy per acre than any single species and can even lower atmospheric carbon dioxide by storing it in their roots or in soil.

"Biofuels made from high-diversity mixtures of prairie plants can reduce global warming by removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere," says Tilman. "Even when grown on infertile soils, they can provide a substantial portion of global energy needs, and leave fertile land for food production."

More at the link.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I think more and more we will see that corn based ethanol is not the answer and is just another bandaid put up by corporate America for profit. I'd take my fuel made from this any day over that. We need our food to feed people.

kicking that fricking petro-habit we have.

And we will need all of the water we can conserve in the years to come.

naturally selected themselves to the environment in which they reside are the best ones for that habitat?

Wow.

Knock me down with a feather.

I suppose next you will tell me cows and sheep are not good for the land.

These grasses have "not emerged" as an energy source. On the contrary, there is a study by a postdoc that suggests the could be a source of energy. But they are not a source of energy.

There is zero evidence that they will be available on a significant scale in any time frame that involves climate change, which is happening now.

One of the big problems with concepts like this is that people cannot wait to over represent what they say. This doesn't actually produce energy so much as it produces complacency.

Are you working under the assumption that burning biofuels is harmless and will kill absolutely no one at any time?

Try this: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/01/28/1075088091566.html

http://www.smh.com.au/ffxImage/urlpicture_id_1075088093369_2004/01/28/ethanol,0.jpg

The ethanol tanker explosion off Virgina, which killed more than 20 people, killed more people in this country than nuclear power killed in the last 50 years in this country. People who burn coal while waiting for your grass game to go commercial - if it ever goes commercial - will kill millions, not that you care.

Oh, and by the way, being born causes death too. Sheeeesh.

Yes, there is a great energy source there, but should we use it to push our cars around or generate healthy meat calories?