Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill shielding identities of gun owners heads to Gov Quinn’s desk(IL)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 05:44 PM
Original message
Bill shielding identities of gun owners heads to Gov Quinn’s desk(IL)
SPRINGFIELD — Gun owners’ identities would remain shielded from public disclosure under legislation the Senate overwhelmingly approved Friday and that Gov. Quinn signaled he would support.

The 42-1 vote for a bill now headed to the governor’s desk represents a victory for gun-rights lobbyists who sought to keep the owners’ names private after Attorney General Lisa Madigan contended that lists of those with Firearm Owner Identification cards should be made public under the state’s open-records law.

Sen. Kirk Dillard (R-Hinsdale), the bill’s chief Senate sponsor, argued the U.S. Constitution clearly supports gun owners’ rights to keep their names protected from public inspection and said that the public’s safety is at stake with the legislation.

“These names clearly have a constitutional right to be made private or kept private,” Dillard said. “From a law-enforcement standpoint, I don’t believe we should give burglars a map to systematically burglarize our neighborhoods and our farms.”

http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/5493362-418/bill-shielding-identities-of-gun-owners-heads-to-quinns-desk.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good for them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Republican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Too bad for you that a 42-1 vote means a LOT of Dems supported this.
Still wanna roll with that genetic fallacy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Yeah, sure, in a Democrat controlled house and senate
You really don't know shit about Illinois or our politics, but you feel you had to say something that made you feel good, no matter how stupid it sounds when you say it out loud. But maybe none of them are "Real Dems", right?

If you reach any further you'll fall out of that swing kid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Yes, and it's a disgrace
An utter disgrace that it took a Republican to protect private citizens' right to privacy from being trampled by the state executive. Where the hell were the state senate Democrats? Tailing along behind the Republican, apart from the two who voted present and the one who voted against. You're right, absolutely disgraceful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. What is the general policy on other state-issued IDS - DLs, medical marijuana cards,
fishing/hunting licenses, etc?

Personally, I think the safety concerns are overblown but I'd err on protecting individual privacy without a compelling need to the contrary. Any useful information that could come from this list could just as well be disclosed in aggregate (totals by area, for example)...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneshooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5.  In Texas the list of CHL owners are open to LE only. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Driver's license information is protected under federal law
To be precise, under the Drivers' Privacy Protection Act of 1994, passed five years after actress Rebecca Schaeffer was murdered by a stalker who acquired her address from California DMV records.

Domestic partnership records are open to the public in Washington state (a situation I dislike). As far as I can discern, hunting and fishing licenses are not a matter of public record in Washington state.

The appeals to open record laws that are made to support making firearm licenses publicly available pervert the purpose of such laws, in my opinion. The object of these laws is to improve transparency of government, not to make it easier for private citizens to snoop on their fellow citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. Good news...why give criminals names of targets?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC