Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This guy shouldn't have had a gun

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
Walter_Bowman Donating Member (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 01:17 PM
Original message
This guy shouldn't have had a gun
Bystander shoots suspect during robbery at ATM


By OREN DORELL, Staff Writer


CLAYTON -- William "Don" Strickland takes his small-caliber handgun wherever he goes, just in case any criminals cross his path.
On Thursday, the former iron worker on permanent disability used it -- when he saw a young woman being robbed at an ATM and the robber trying to get away.

First Strickland shot the tires of the getaway car; then he shot the man inside once in the right leg.

The robber escaped, but soon Clayton police arrested Morris Levi Stith of Clayton after Stith checked into Johnston Memorial Hospital with a gunshot wound to the right leg. Stith was charged with robbery and assault with a deadly weapon, Clayton police said. Strickland probably will not be charged.

Stith complained about being shot as he hobbled into the magistrate's office in downtown Clayton with a police escort Thursday afternoon. "It's wrong, man," he said.

http://newsobserver.com/news/triangle/story/2778042p-2574281c.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. It All Depends
Did he have a permit to carry it? What's the law in Clayton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walter_Bowman Donating Member (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think (not sure) that is a shall-issue state (nt)
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entropy Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. The law
in North Carolina is that a citizen can own a handgun, and carry it openly, without any permit what-so-ever. This includes driving around in your vehicle with it open on your dash, or on the seat next to you.

You have to get a permit to purchase a handgun, which costs $5 from your local sheriffs office. This is essentially the "brady" ceck in advance of purchase, and means no wait when you go to buy your handgun.

To have a concealed carry permit you must apply for, get fingerprinted, take training etc.

Judge, jury and executioner? Think of the trash that was robbing her. What was he doing?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. did he have to shoot the attacke after shooting the tires
sounds like a guy who was chomping at the bit to finally get a chance to shoot someone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walter_Bowman Donating Member (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. the attacker was obviously dangerous
It's not whether he had too, it's whether he had a reasonable cause to believe so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyandproud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. if he hadn't shot the dude in the leg..
I'm pretty sure he would have gotten away...even criminals can change a flat tire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. At Least He Didn't Shoot to Kill
Perhaps deadly force is NOT always called for.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-03 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. true
but I think shooting someone is a pretty violent thing to do. if the guy gets away with a flat tire get his license plate and let the cops shoot him <sarcasm/>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. CO, you're always a champion for more aggresive enforcement
of gun laws.

When a crime is being committed, any citizen has the authority and moral responsibility to help the victims. Would you have been upset if a law enforcement officer had done the exact things the citizen did?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I Have a Real Problem With People Taking the Law into Their Own Hands
At least in this case the guy didn't shoot to kill. But the basic concept of someone -- ANYONE -- putting themselves in a position of judge, jury, and executioner bothers me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cthulu_2004 Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. CO, you do understand....
about how lethal force laws apply, right? If somebody justifiably shoots somebody, it's not because they're acting as judge, jury, and executioner, it's because it's legally permissible to meet force with force. Had the person shot an innocent man, the person would be charged with the appropriate crime. A person would be acting as judge, jury, and executioner if he shot the guy after the police had him in custody. During the crime itself, he's not acting that way, he's acting in defense of his person or of others.

There's a not so subtle difference that I hope you can understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. But they DON'T have the authority to use deadly force.
What if he'd gotten there a few seconds later and saw somebody ELSE running from the scene -- not the attacker/robber, mistook that person for the robber and shot him? Or what if he'd tried to shoot EARLIER, perhaps during the robbery, missed, and shot the person being robbed?

Having a license/permit to carry DOES NOT mean the unrestricted right to use the damn thing whenever you feel like it. And yes, I DO own a gun and will always own a gun.

People like this are dangerous.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cthulu_2004 Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Ummm...
He shot the guy not because of the robbery, he shot the guy because the guy was trying to run him over with his car. I assume that the shooter was present when the driver was trying to run him over... ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cthulu_2004 Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. You can be run over just as dead...
by a car with one flat tire as by a car with 4 good tires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cthulu_2004 Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. "It's wrong, man."
Too bad he didn't think of right and wrong while robbing the woman...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Do Two Wrongs Make a Right?
I don't think they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cthulu_2004 Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I don't see anything wrong...
with shooting somebody who is trying to kill you. Oddly enough, the police don't, either. Guess you're outvoted. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC