Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Does Olmert Want?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
Englander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 12:57 PM
Original message
What Does Olmert Want?
By Amos Elon

The Accidental Empire: Israel and the Birth of the Settlements, 1967–1977
by Gershom Gorenberg
Times Books, 454 pp., $30.00


After weeks of bargaining with smaller parties, each with its own special interests, Ehud Olmert, the leader of the new Kadima party, has finally formed a new Israeli government. The election campaign was overshadowed by the specter of the comatose Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, in the third month of a massive hemorrhagic stroke but still formally in office. Hawks and doves pledged their undying loyalty to his "legacy," whatever it was. Sharon was a reckless, controversial man, exceedingly contradictory— as perhaps many interesting men are; only the dull have simple characters. He was not a man of peace, as President Bush once called him, but out of tune with his time. In an age of decolonization, half a century after the French–Algerian war, he was mainly responsible for the huge "settlement project" in the occupied territories, now often described as the great historical mistake of 1967. The occupied territories continue to fester in Israeli life like a monstrous disease. Their days seem numbered. "I hate the corpses of empires," Rebecca West wrote. "They stink so badly that I cannot believe that even in life they were healthy."

It was a mean little empire, even before the inhabitants became restive. Other colonialists co-opted local elites, intermarried, built universities, great waterworks, and other public amenities for the colonized; Israel did little of the sort. Nearly all real improvements in the territories since 1967 were financed by the Saudis and the Gulf States. In 2001 there was not a single traffic light in the occupied territories. They were a captive market and a source of cheap labor; this was ultimately counterproductive, since it retarded the modernization of the construction and other industries. The settlement project remains a main, some say the main, impediment to a historic compromise to end a hundred-year war between two national movements over the same piece of real estate.

How this mini-empire first came into being after the brief 1967 war is brilliantly described by Gershom Gorenberg in The Accidental Empire, his masterly book based on original research. The empire was not founded in a fit of absentmindedness, as was once (wrongly) said of the British Empire, but as Gorenberg's documentation shows, it was the result of deliberate decisions by Israeli governments of the left and the right. In a book that could have served as a telling additional chapter in Barbara Tuchman's The March of Folly, he shows how only seven months after the 1967 war there were already eight hundred settlers living in the West Bank. The obsessive drive by all Israeli governments after 1967 to establish "facts on the ground" (the Hebrew translation for faits accomplis) was also an almost blind reflex reaction born of past experience—the practice of Israel's founding fathers to add "one dunam after another" and the memory of the UN partition resolution of 1947, which assigned to Israel precisely those parts of Palestine in which many Jews were already living. After the 1948 war, during which some 600,000 Palestinians fled the country or were kicked out, most nations recognized Israel within 78 percent of mandatory Palestine, an area much larger than was allotted it in the original partition resolution.

The settlement project, as Gorenberg shows, was promoted by successive Israeli governments of the left and the right, overriding objections voiced at various times by a minority of cabinet ministers and a handful of dissenters outside the government in the academy and the press. The project was first intended to provide Israel with secure borders, as called for in Security Council Resolution 242, passed after the 1967 war. But soon there was no stopping it. The result, as Gorenberg puts it, was nothing less than "an artificially created Bosnia." Its first promoters were the secularists Shimon Peres, Moshe Dayan, and Yigael Allon, of whom it was said that after God the Father had been declared dead, they had married the Motherland. The first settlements were modestly called "outposts." Raymond Aron, then visiting Israel, asked Prime Minister Levi Eshkol if he wasn't worried about a rebellion by the Arabs as had happened in Algeria. Gorenberg cites Eshkol's answer: "No. This isn't Algeria. We can strangle terror in the occupied territories."

Much, much more at;
New York Review of Books

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. An end to the senseless killing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yeah, I'm sure he's only for the sensible killing
just like every other hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yep..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Better a live "hypocrite" than just another dead Jew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Why do you portray the two as mutually exclusive?
You should check out Gush Shalom, the Israeli Peace Bloc, for some reasonable and intelligent answers to questions like these.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. "reasonable and intelligent answers"? Sure.
But not the most workable answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. What are, in your opinion, the most "workable" answers?
Thanks!

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Abbas outlined a starting place today.
2 states - '67 border. (The border will be a sticking point, but that will be an approximate end point.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. For $200, Alex...
"What is a stable, secure, and safe Israel?"

(In case someone is not familiar, this is based on the tv game show "Jeopardy!")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. So declare them a state.
Start with Gaza.

Do it now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Why should Israel do that?
Let Abbas go to the UN and declare Gaza a nation and apply for nationhood, with the understanding that parts of the West Bank will follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Resolution 181 also created an arab state as well, not just Israel.
A good portion of that land was taken by Israel using force and, through their actions, it seems uncontroversial to say they have little intention of giving it back.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. And?
The Arab Palestinians and the Arab nations rejected Resolution 181 out-right, the Jews of Palestine did not. What does this have to do with what is happening now? That ship has sailed. The lands in question now are those taken after 1967.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC