Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Israel subs go nuclear amid fears over Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
Herschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 11:47 AM
Original message
Israel subs go nuclear amid fears over Iran
Israel has modified United States-supplied cruise missiles to carry nuclear warheads on submarines, giving the Middle East's only nuclear power the ability to launch atomic weapons from land, air and under the sea.

Bush Administration and Israeli officials say the move bolsters Israel's deterrence capacity in the event that Iran develops nuclear weapons.

It also comes as Syria insisted it had a right to defend itself, warning Israel against further raids into its territory such as last week's air strike on an alleged Palestinian training camp.

Two Bush officials described the missile modification and an Israeli official confirmed it. All wished to remain anonymous.

cut

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/10/12/1065917278040.html

Iran should mind itself and not escalate this situation. They are crating grave danger for their own people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Do you understand why Iran is trying to get nuclear weapons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. You seem to understand
Is it a good thing? I think you know the amswer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. No, it is not a good thing...
but nor is it an unexpected or easily preventable development.

Israel's aggressiveness and the pre-emptive doctrine of the US has scared a few nations, that's for sure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. An unruly nation
is developing a nuclear threat. Israel moves to defend herself. Yet you say Israel is agressive. Oh, my.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. "Unruly?"
Edited on Sun Oct-12-03 12:20 PM by Darranar
You know an unruly nation? Perhaps the one which occupies three sections of land, oppresses a people, and has no real intention to stop? Perhaps one that willingly invaded another sovereign country in 1982, 1965, and 1967? Perhaps one that has no respect for the airspace of other nations? Perhaps one that just launched a provocative strike that accomplished nothing of worth for the security of it?

If you don't call those actions agressive, then I guess we disagree on the definition...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is arguably a good thing.
Since it gives Israel a survivable retaliatory threat,
it removes some of the hair-trigger nature of "deterrence"
via ballistic missiles in the middle east. Israel is not
in the "use it or lose it" situation, at least WRT the subs.

OTOH, if it encourages the morons to attack Iran, then it's
bad, because getting even after you've been flattened is still
being flattened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good point...
now, if only Syria and Iran had these...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Explain yourself
What morons are you referring to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drdon326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. JEWS.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
30. Now, now, Doc.
You know perfectly well Israel is a democratic state with a
large number of non-Jewish citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drdon326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. lol
very adeptly put.

btw, i know a certain GREEN HOOSIER who would give you
an argument about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Sharon and Co...
the right-wing nuts in charge of Israel today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drdon326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Is that your opinion.....
or are you speaking for bemildred??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I know who bemildred has refered to as morons in the past...
but I'm only guessing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drdon326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Ohhhh....beee-milllll-dred ??
there seems to be some confusion as to who you meant.

Do you think you might want to help clarify??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. You do seem to be an astute reader of my diatribes.
Although I have been known to belabor Mr. Arafat occasionally
in that fashion too. Clearly he would not be at issue here.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. Clearly:
Edited on Sun Oct-12-03 03:00 PM by bemildred
The morons who think attacking Iran is a good thing to do.

Edit: obviously, that would not include anyone here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saudade Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Escalating?
"Iran should mind itself and not escalate this situation."

Who really is "escalating"?

Who bombed Syria last week?

Who wastes my tax dollars killing defenseless people and is an albatross around America's collective neck, dragging my country into its own isolation and rogue-nation status?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Little Israel struck at terroists in Syria
Iran has created a situation with it's move toward nuclear weapons. Israel is responding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. How do you know that they were terrorists?
Firing two rockets into a trainign camp does nothing. It was clearly meant for another purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saudade Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Ridiculous
Edited on Sun Oct-12-03 12:15 PM by Saudade
"Iran has created a situation with it's move toward nuclear weapons. Israel is responding."

Actually, Israel has created "a situation" with the longest military occupation in modern history, and stockpiling nuclear warheads, chemical and biological weapons and refusing to sign non-proliferation treaties (not to mention, refusing declare an international border, being in violation of international law, etc. etc.)

Iran has ever right to and interest in responding to this "situation" by developing the capability to defend itself.

Really, the first "sitation" is the one that must and will be addressed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Your concept of longest anything is bogus
How about England's occupation of Ireland? Or even the United States' occupation of, well, the United States?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. True...
but at least in the US, Native Americans have equal rights. Palestians (not including Israeli Arabs) don't have equal rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. Please, oh please
think before you speak. Israel has no control over The Egyption weasel's policy of no civil rights. I hope it's not raining whereever you are because I know you will blame Israel for that also. Or if it's too hot, or cold, or you gain/lose five pounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. WHAT?
They're living under an OCCUPATION! Even if they could vote for PA officials, they wouldn't be able to do much!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Actually
England only currently occupies Northern Ireland, and both sides finally came to a realization that terrorism and the use of military force to stop terrorism only leads to more killing. It's too bad the Israelis and the Palestinians have not figured this one out yet. But there is always hope.

As for the US occupation, it did not historically start until after the Revolutionary War. Because the US did not exist as an entity until then.

Instead why not say the occupation of North America by white Europeans, which is a more accurate description.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Simply comparing lengths of time
And Northern Ireland is still part of Ireland, at least according to most Irish. How many hundred years has THAT been?

Actually, I've said this before, the Palestinians need to learn from the Irish model. They didn't get everything they wanted, but they got a nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gimel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. And Americans whine
Edited on Sun Oct-12-03 01:20 PM by Gimel
Oh, you ripped my little toe-nail!

On edt: Of course, it's only some Americans that are complaining about Israel's financial outlay and budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saudade Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. "Whining"
I only "complain" about Israel's financial outlays because American taxpayers finance Israel's genocide, theft of land via subsidized settlement and overall national suicide by moronic policies.

If I didn't have to help pay for this madness, I really wouldn't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Equinox Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. Whining?
You benefit from my tax dollars, and you dare call me a whiner?

Become a citizen of the US and pay taxes and I'll take you more seriously.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Whining
Edited on Sun Oct-12-03 04:07 PM by bluesoul
I wonder who would be whining if all the financial, military and political support from the US to Israel stopped..:eyes: Maybe it would put some sense into a few heads anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gimel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. I am a US citizen
I have paid taxes. so what does that change?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Equinox Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-03 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Have paid?
Ok...so do you live in Israel now? If you do, I'm willing to bet you don't pay US taxes. Am I correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gimel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 05:03 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. So?
Do you? I still have voting rights and many members of my immediate family live in the US. I have paid taxes in the past. Have YOU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jmcgowanjm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. $ for Wall, Settlements, 4th strongest army, nuclear sub
This is magical. Everyone should copy Israel's
economic program.
Where Everyone can have Everything
w/ no pain!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gimel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Appearances
Where Everyone can have Everything
w/ no pain!


Appearances aren't everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. Not fourth strongest
Just accept it's either the strongest military in the Mideast (when the U.S. is not hanging in Iraq) or one of the world's strongest armies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. So
There is no good reason why the Iranians should stop making weapons grade plutonium now, is there.

And there is very little reason for North Korea to stop making missiles. Looks like Pandoras box can't be closed now.

Let's take bets to see who will nuke who first, my money's on the Israelis. All it means to them is less Muslims in the world, not really a big concern of either the Israeli or US governments.

By the way did you know that Iran is also producing cruise missiles, as well as purchasing them from both Russia and China.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. I believe Iran is enriching uranium.
I also have read they have their own mines, hence it's
will be tricky to make them stop, short of "regime change".
The centrifuges etc. are a good deal less obvious from
satellite images than a nuclear power plant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC