Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Israel at 60: Zionism’s Fatal Flaw

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:50 AM
Original message
Israel at 60: Zionism’s Fatal Flaw
by Ira Chernus

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/05/14/8940/

---snip---

In fact for many of these first Zionists-most of them modernized, secular intellectuals-Jewish religion had become a burden. Seeing no other way to be Jewish except the religious, most might well have assimilated completely into their European environment. The first great leader of the Zionist movement, Theodore Herzl (himself a highly assimilated Jew), wrote in his classic pamphlet The Jewish State: “If only we were left in peace…” The ellipsis spoke more eloquently than words of the seemingly impossible dream of assimilation. Herzl immediately followed with the bitter premise of Zionism: “But we shall not be left in peace.” Anti-semitism, he argued, was a permanent fact of life for the Diasporic Jew.

Herzl’s close associate, Max Nordau, summed up their assessment for the First Zionist Congress: “The emancipated Jew… has abandoned his specific Jewish character , yet the nations do not accept him as part of their national communities.” Further, Nordau implied, the nations would never accept him. Craving a normal life with a normal modern national identity, he had no choice but to create a secular nation of his own.

Thus the mainstream of Zionism assumed from the start that their “normalization” demanded not only independence and self-governing institutions, but a transformation of Jewish identity from a religious to a secular nationalist basis. As the famed Zionist writer Micah Berdichevski proclaimed: “Israel must precede the Torah, the human being before the religion.” This view was enshrined in 1948, when Israel’s Independence Proclamation promised to safeguard freedom of religion, and from religion, for every citizen.

These were the ideas and ideals that brought most of the early Zionists to Zionism-but not all. There was always a dissenting minority who saw Zionism as a way to not merely save Jews but, more importantly, Judaism. They expected the Jewish homeland (not necessarily a political state, but necessarily in Palestine) to be a platform from which Jewish renewal would be launched. . . .


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why is this a fatal flaw.
I hold higher the value of a secular USA than I do its cultural identity as a Christian nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pelsar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. a flaw?...quite the contrary....
Edited on Thu May-15-08 12:17 PM by pelsar
Israel must precede the Torah, the human being before the religion.” This view was enshrined in 1948, when Israel’s Independence Proclamation promised to safeguard freedom of religion, and from religion, for every citizen.

the way it should be......i shudder to think of israel as some kind of theocratic regime as in the taliban, iran or saudi arabia......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vegasaurus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. The writer clearly does not know Israel
Those that live there feel very "normal".

It is only outsiders that make claims otherwise.

People in Israel are busy developing patents, life saving treatments, new technology, going to school, work, play like people in successful societies do.

Nothing about daily Israeli life is "abnormal", except that there are hostile people on all sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. A confused and confusing article
Edited on Thu May-15-08 04:25 PM by LeftishBrit
The author seems to be saying that Israel ought to make more concerted efforts toward peace negotiations and a lasting peace. I fully agree with that - for both sides! However, he also seems to imply that the prospects for peace and a successful society would be greater if Israel was a Jewish theocracy. This is a very strange suggestion. Theocracies are rarely noted either for their peaceful relations with others (especially with others of a different religion); or for the freedom they give their own people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC