AIPAC speakers portray Ahmadinejad as a 'gift'

<snip>

"Two pro-Israel speakers at the AIPAC policy conference said yesterday that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the bete noir of the lobby, is also a boon to the lobby; for if the Iranian President is not reelected next month, AIPAC's case against Iranian nukes will be damaged.

At a breakout session on the Iranian elections, Ilan Berman, vice president of the American Foreign Policy Council, said of the Iranian government:



Later a questioner raised the issue again. What if Ahmadinejad is defeated in June's election and replaced by “someone less inflammatory”-- what would that do to efforts to publicize Iran’s threat?
Ken Pollack of the Saban Center of the Brookings Institution acknowledged the concern. Throughout the panel, Pollack had struck a hawkish stance in line with the AIPAC position of Congress authorizing stiff sanctions to hurt the Iranian economy if Iran goes ahead with nukes. He said:



http://www.philipweiss.org/mondoweiss/2009/05/aipac-speaker-calls-ahmadinejad-the-gift-that-keeps-on-giving-.html

unfortunately it doesnt look like its going to happen:-

http://www.presstv.ir/election2009/detail.aspx?id=93566

(yes, I understand its Iran's state news agency. However, the numbers ring true to me)

Karroubi should get out. He has nothing like the support Mousavi has. Mousavi is well regarded and fondly remembered by a lot of Iranians. With a clear shot at Ahmadinejad he might make it. There was far too much name saturation in the reformist camp this past year, with Khatami weighing in as well as Karroubi.

One of the major impacts of Ahmadinejad losing would be that Americans would actually realise that there is a meaningful democratic process in Iran, which would do much to puncture the caricatured view of Iran in the US.