Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tony Blair to testify at SFRC meeting today - likely on new Middle East plan expected in a month

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:55 AM
Original message
Tony Blair to testify at SFRC meeting today - likely on new Middle East plan expected in a month
Edited on Thu May-14-09 08:57 AM by karynnj
or so.


Edited on Wed May-13-09 09:36 PM by karynnj
THE MIDDLE EAST:
THE ROAD TO PEACE
HEARING
before the

COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
UNITED STATES SENATE
ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS
FIRST SESSION
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Time: 2:00 P.M.
Place: 419 Dirksen Senate Building
Presiding: Senator Kerry


Witnesses:
+ The Right Honorable Tony Blair
Former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
and Envoy on the Middle East
London, UK


http://foreign.senate.gov/hearings/2009/hrg090514p.html

When Blair stepped down as Prime Minister in June, 2007, he was appointed as Middle East envoy hours later later - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6244358.stm There was concern, particularly by Hamas that he was too close to Israel and the US.

He said then,
"He told MPs: "The absolute priority is to try to give effect to what is now the consensus across the international community - that the only way of bringing stability and peace to the Middle East is a two-state solution."

The UK, like the US, has been seen as leaning too Israel's side and in the British press, there have been mixed reviews of his accomplishments. The Daily Mail, a leftish tabloid, pointed out that France took the lead in ending the hostilities in Gaza and questioned if Blair's costs were worth paying and pointing out that he has spent much time on business activities:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1140615/Tony-Blairs-job-Middle-East-peace-envoy-costs-taxpayers-500-000.html

Here, is a more positive article, where you can see that the British comments on the bombing of Gaza were stronger than American ones at the same time.


Tony Blair will fly to the Middle East next week amid mounting international efforts to broker a fresh ceasefire between Israel and Hamas. Britain has condemned the "unacceptable" loss of life caused by the Israeli strikes on Gaza.

<snip>

The former prime minister, who is the envoy for the Quartet made up of the EU, Russia, United States and UN, spent yesterday contacting senior figures including the Israeli Defence Minister, Ehud Barak, as international pressure for a ceasefire mounted.

<snip>

Asked if the Israeli attacks could be justified, Mr Miliband said: "I think that any innocent loss of life is unacceptable and in this case there have been massive casualties, some of them civilians and some of them children. That is one reason we have called for a ceasefire.

"This is a very dangerous and dark moment, partly because of the lives lost and the humanitarian crisis that exists; partly because of the threat to the chance of the comprehensive peace that is so important for the Palestinians but also for Israel; and partly for the fuel for radicalism that can be argued by some to be the right response."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/blair-visits-middle-east-amid-pressure-to-broker-ceasefire-1216227.html

Interesting Israeli article from last week on what Tony Blair is doing. He and the Obama administration are working on a new Middle Eastern peace plan.



"We're about to get a new framework," Blair said Tuesday evening, adding that he did not know the details. "The reason I say people should be more hopeful, is that this is a framework that is being worked on at the highest level in the American administration, (and) in the rest of the international community."

The Obama administration has promised to work for the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel. It has portrayed a two-state solution as the only way to solve the Mideast conflict and defined it as a U.S. national interest.

President Barack Obama is holding separate meetings at the White House this month with the Israeli, Palestinian and Egyptian leaders to hear their views.

Once those meetings are over, the Quartet is to convene in Washington to
discuss and present the new strategy, Blair said. The Quartet includes the U.S., the United Nations, the European Union and Russia. "I think that within the next five to six weeks, you will have a very clear picture of what the plan is," Blair said.


http://zionism-israel.com/israel_news/2009/05/obama-administration-quartet-are.html

Although the Bush administration ignored Middle East peace for 6 years, it is important to note that they committed to a two state solution and in the last 2 years did some good work culminating in Annapolis conference last fall. Here is a nice description from Haaretz, a Jewish newspaper which has had some of the best coverage of that area of the world.



Israel and the Palestinian Authority are to announce on Sunday their commitment to continuing talks on the core issues in 2009 after president-elect Barack Obama takes office. The parties have agreed to negotiate based on the principles determined at the Annapolis conference.

<snip>

The obligation of the parties to the process and a two-state solution; bilateral negotiations only between Israel and the PA, which will be secret; commitment to the first stage of the Road Map - a cessation of settlement construction and evacuation of illegal outposts by Israel, and a war on terror by the Palestinians; Israel and the PA will continue working together to bolster Palestinian institutions, with an emphasis on security and judicial bodies; and the international community will continue to support and assist the process diplomatically and economically.


http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1035129.html

The importance of this is that because Rice and the State Department reached these agreements on the two controversial issues - having 2 states and settlements - Obama should have an easier time stating that this is a bipartisan foreign policy - and it will make any right wing Jewish (a phrase I rarely write) attacks on it less successful.

Consider, the speeches by Biden and Kerry to AIPAC, where both unambiguously spoke for a two state solution and against settlements were not met by hostility at the AIPAC conference.

link to those speeches - http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2009/05/biden_kerry_off.html
link to CSPAN video - http://cspan.org/Watch/Media/2009/05/05/HP/A/18231/Vice+Pres+Biden+Sen+John+Kerry+DMA+Remarks+at+AIPAC+Annual+Conference.aspx

As was mentioned in the coverage of the AIPAC convention - AIPAC, which has been a powerful voice from the right on Israel, grudging agreed with the two state solution.

The largest US Jewish pr-peace group, Brit Tzedak V'Shalom praised the speeches. They have been advocating for a two state solution for years - here is a link. http://btvshalom.org/ga_messages/ga_20090507.html (They erred a little in that Kerry's speech was minutes before Biden's, not the day before.)

So, it looks like the UK and US, Israel's two strongest supporters, have moved unambiguously to supporting a two state solution - as have the UN and the Pope. Now, had Livni become President, it would be easy to say that the stars might finally be aligned. The question is whether Netanyahu will follow in the footsteps of Begin, also a Likkud member, who had the courage to work for peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Very interesting...
though I wouldn't trust Tony much further than I could throw him, especially on anything to do with the Middle East OR peace issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, Blair is way the heck less important than resolving the "Middle East" issues.
So I'm willing to wait and see. It's certainly true that the rhetoric has become less intransigent, so lets wait and see what the facts look like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Tony Blair, war criminal, and according to new press reports he is a crook as well
Tony Blair has as much credibility as Al Capone. The best contribution that Blair can make to the Middle East peace process is to step down and return to the UK to live in obscurity.

MPs' expenses: Tony Blair facing questions over the £296,000 mortgage

Tony Blair is facing fresh questions over how he funded his multi-million-pound property empire after details of the former Prime Minister's claims were leaked to The Sunday Telegraph.

By Gordon Rayner, Chief Reporter
Last Updated: 9:33AM BST 10 May 2009

The documents show that Mr Blair remortgaged his constituency home for £296,000, almost 10 times what he paid for it, months before he bought his town house in London for £3.65 million. Mr Blair was able to claim on his parliamentary expenses for the interest repayments on almost a third of the new mortgage on his constituency home.

The amount loaned was sufficient to cover the deposit on his house in Connaught Square, west London, one of five properties owned by the former prime minister, valued at £10 million in total.

Although Mr Blair did not break parliamentary rules, dozens of MPs appear to have used similar strategies to build property portfolios, which has given rise to suggestions that they "played the system".

Mr Blair, who has earned about £16 million since leaving office, through public speaking, directorships and a book deal, bought his constituency home in Trimdon, County Durham, shortly after he was elected as an MP in 1983.

He took out a £30,000 mortgage to buy the house, later remortgaging it for about £90,000 to cover the cost of improvements and renovations.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5301764/MPs-expenses-Tony-Blair-facing-questions-over-the-296000-mortgage.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC