Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

International Attention Focused on ASUC Divestment Vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 09:57 AM
Original message
International Attention Focused on ASUC Divestment Vote
Allie Bidwell
Contributing Writer
Wednesday, April 14, 2010

International attention will descend on the ASUC Senate meeting tonight as senators consider upholding the passage of a controversial bill urging the student government and the University of California to divest from two companies that have provided war supplies to the Israeli military.

The bill names two companies-United Technologies and General Electric-as supplying Israel with the technology necessary to attack civilian populations in Lebanon, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. The bill originally passed the senate March 17 by a 16-4 vote following about six hours of discussion. A two-thirds majority, or 14 votes, is needed in order to override the veto.

Senators have received more than 13,000 e-mails, roughly split between both sides of the controversy.

Prominent figures including South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu, activist Naomi Klein and leftist MIT professor Noam Chomsky have spoken in support of overriding ASUC President Will Smelko's March 24 veto of the bill. Local and national pro-Israel groups such as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)-an influential Washington, D.C. lobby organization-Berkeley Hillel and the Anti-Defamation League have each stated the bill is divisive and unfairly targets Israel.

Supporters of the bill say divesting from the two companies would make a powerful statement against Israeli actions in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, which supporters have compared to apartheid-era South Africa.


http://www.dailycal.org/article/109056/international_attention_focused_on_asuc_divestment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. They didn't get enough votes to override the veto so they tabled the bill until next week
They needed 14 votes to override the veto, but there were only 13 (with 1 abstention). One of the senators who wanted to override the vote switched to the "no" side so that they could propose a motion to table the bill until next week's meeting.

The debate leading up to last night's (this morning's) vote lasted well into the wee hours of the morn with a variety of speakers from inside and outside the UCB community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I wasn't aware of that oberliner, thanks. Where did you read about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. There were various folks giving Twitter updates
Edited on Thu Apr-15-10 01:47 PM by oberliner
Here are two from opposing perspectives:

http://twitter.com/ysalahi

http://twitter.com/buberzionist

Edit to add one more:

http://twitter.com/isaacnoah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yep. ASUC Senate Still Undecided on Vetoed Divestment Bill
By Allie Bidwell and Nick Myers
Contributing Writers

Date Added Thursday, April 15, 2010 | 9:27 am
Last Updated Thursday, April 15, 2010 | 10:24 am

Following a nearly nine-hour discussion that began at 10:30 p.m. Wednesday evening and lasted into Thursday morning, ASUC senators have yet to reach a decision on whether or not they would uphold or override President Will Smelko's March 24 veto of a controversial bill urging the student government and the UC to divest from two companies that have supplied Israel with materials for alleged war crimes.

After an initial 12-7-1 vote to uphold Smelko's veto, the senate tabled the bill and will reconsider it next week. Several senators said they would work to alter the bill.

The one abstaining vote made by Student Action Senator Minji Kim resulted from what she said was a lack of sufficient qualifications to vote on such an issue.

CalSERVE Senator and Academic Affairs Vice President-Elect Viola Tang, who voted to uphold the veto, motioned to reconsider the vote to override the veto an hour and a half after senate discussion initially began.

http://www.dailycal.org/article/109089/asuc_senate_still_undecided_on_vetoed_divestment_b
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC