Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ya'alon No need ever to remove any settlements

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 09:16 PM
Original message
Ya'alon No need ever to remove any settlements
Edited on Thu Apr-15-10 09:21 PM by bemildred
Israel should not have to remove any settlements in a peace agreement with the Palestinians, Strategic Affairs Minister Moshe Ya’alon has told The Jerusalem Post, adding that just as Arabs live in Israel, so, too, should Jews be able to live in a future Palestinian entity.

“If we are talking about coexistence and peace, why the insistence that the territory they receive be ethnically cleansed of Jews?” Ya’alon asked during a wide-ranging interview that will appear in the Post’s Yom Ha’atzmaut supplement on Monday.

“Why do those areas have to be Judenrein?” he asked. “Don’t Arabs live here, in the Negev and the Galilee? Why isn’t that part of our public discussion? Why doesn’t that scream to the heavens?”

Ya’alon said that if Israel and the Palestinians were truly headed down the path of peace and coexistence, “Jews living in Judea and Samaria under Israeli sovereignty and citizenship” should be possible.

http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=173302
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. As long as Israeli's formally revoke their Israeli Citizenship for citizinehips in...
a new Palastinian State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayecy Donating Member (931 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. If Ya'alon means what he says, what is the problem?
Who would object to Jews (or any other race/nationality) living in any state so long as they accept the law of their host state and pay their taxes?

Of course, there may be questions of land-title etc but it would do the Palestinian cause a world of good if they would come out and unequivocally support the right of the settlers to stay in their homes.

What is not acceptable is for Jews to live in Judea and Samaria under Israeli sovereignty.....That would not be acceptable in any other democratic state.
.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. I agree that they should have the right to be Palestinian citizens if they choose...
But not to form enclaves of Israelis under continued Israeli jurisdiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Agreed. The problem is, the settlers don't want to live as equals with the Palestinians
They want to live their with the understanding that it is THEIR land, and that the Palestinians can only stay on their sufferance and at their mercy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-10 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. that's a hateful, broadbrush statement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. If they want to live there, it should be under the very same terms
under which the Arabs live in Israel. And I think that includes living under the sovereignty of the state they're living in. It also means they don't get to live in Arabrein gated communities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-10 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. If's offensive to use the term "Judenrein" in this context
Edited on Fri Apr-16-10 05:13 PM by Ken Burch
Asking illegal settlers who claim to be Jewish to move off of lands they took by force is NOT the same thing as the Nazis sending people to the death camps. That word should NEVER be used in this context.

(I'm directing that at the people quoted in the story, bemildred, not at you. Just so you know).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Violet_Crumble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-10 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Yeah, usually people are all over the Nazi references in this forum...
Not this time, though. Strange that....

That sort of language gives a good clue that this guy isn't talking about any sort of peaceful co-existance between equals. He was opposed to the disengagement from Gaza, is a strong supporter of the settler movement, and in a 2002 interview with Ha'aretz likened the Palestinians to cancer:

There is something surprising in the fact that you see the Palestinian threat as an existential threat.

"The characteristics of that threat are invisible, like cancer. When you are attacked externally, you see the attack, you are wounded. Cancer, on the other hand, is something internal. Therefore, I find it more disturbing, because here the diagnosis is critical. If the diagnosis is wrong and people say it's not cancer but a headache, then the response is irrelevant. But I maintain that it is cancer. My professional diagnosis is that there is a phenomenon here that constitutes an existential threat."

Does that mean that what you are doing now, as chief of staff, in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, is applying chemotherapy?

"There are all kinds of solutions to cancerous manifestations. Some will say it is necessary to amputate organs. But at the moment, I am applying chemotherapy, yes."

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=202714&contrassID=2&subContrassID=14&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-10 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. Most of the settlements should stay, but under Palestinian sovereignty.
Ya'alon is being spectacularly dishonest in suggesting that the only alternative to ethnic cleansing is for the settlements to remain under Israeli sovereignty.

Those settlements not on privately-owned land should be allowed to remain, but under Palestinian rule - similar to the status of Palestinians in Israel, but without the massive and institutionalised discrimination against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-10 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. "similar to the status of Palestinians in Israel, but w/o massive, institutionalised discrimination"
Edited on Sat Apr-17-10 10:42 AM by shira
:eyes:

Are you serious?

What type of rule do you expect settlers to live under in a future Palestine with - miracles of miracles - a united Hamas/Fatah doing the ruling?



http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=124x310145#310162

What do you think about that?

Mind blowing, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-10 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Does this mean that Ya’alon will support the Palestinians' right of return?
What's sauce for the goose, is sauce for the gander. Ya’alon's statement can also be used in justification of a single bi-national and democratic state in present day Israel and Occupied Palestine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-10 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Will Ya'alon do that? well, here's one answer:
אל תעצרו את הנשימה שלך
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eg-ptiangirl Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-10 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. Cool
They can live as Palestinian Citizens and obey the Palestinian laws.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-18-10 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
13. A majority of settlers would leave if their homes were sold for a fair price
Edited on Sun Apr-18-10 06:42 AM by shira
http://freedomsyndicate.com/fair0000/ft03.html

Looks like one way to get Jews out of the settlements is for Palestinians and their local supporters to simply buy the homes from them for a fair price.

It's already happening...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZyEmn4wjnY

Easiest way to resettle refugees from the W.Bank is to buy settlement homes and house refugee families in their place. Kill 2 birds with one stone. ;)

So what's the holdup? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC